Tweet
Why!!
-
-
Bl00dy SWP starting again. Hill at Lb worries me, although that said we hardly have plenty of options at the back at the moment .You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity. -
No Dyer & a defence that looks very vulnerable = Park & SWPComment
-
Why not try putting up the team, bit controversial like but worth a tryComment
-
Scores against Reading with a really good goal, pay 4 mil for him and put him on the bench for the sake of play SWP? Makes senseComment
-
he loves swp for some reason . offers nothing. hoillet 10 times better than him. hoillet was our best player wednesday so his reward is a place on the bench for tonightComment
-
@OfficialQPR: #QPR XI: Cesar, Hill, Park, Cisse, Wright-Phillips, Granero, Onuoha, Nelsen, Zamora, Faurlin, MbiaComment
-
Taarabt,Ephraim,Mackie,Hoilett,,Green, Ehmer Diakite subsComment
-
I really cannot understand why SWP would be starting instead of Hoilett. If Hoilett is 100% fit then this is another stupid decision by Hughes.Originally posted by MattyRangers View PostComment
-
So everyone still confident?Comment
-
I would have been in Tarbs and Hoilett had been starting. Still, they're on the bench, let's just hope MH uses his brain and brings them on.Originally posted by QPRDave View PostComment
-
I strangely am mate yes . Zamora n Cisse up top n faurlin n Esteban on the middle fill me with confidence . Hope we go at em from the offOriginally posted by QPRDave View PostYou should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.Comment
-
Because he trusts SWP's defensive capabilities more and worries that we are playing with Clint at LB maybe?!Originally posted by Marshy View PostComment
-
Watch Swp get a hatrick now.....Comment
-
Agree, Tarbs would leave Hill badly exposed. Good decision...Originally posted by Alton Hoop View PostComment
Comment