Last season's game there was garbage but we won courtesy of a goalie howler. Exactly same garbage tonight except no freebies from their keeper to gift us the win. We have not progressed one iota - a year of utter stasis.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Match Thread | Millwall vs QPR
Collapse
X
-
-
Ratings for Romford
Dieng 8 good handling
kakay 5 did ok but can’t cross but
Dickie 7 solid enough
Barbet 7 solid enough
nico 6 gets dragged into wrong position but marked decent player
Cameron 5 non existent
Ball 6 did ok more mobile than Cameron
carroll 6 moved it well enough but so slow
Bos 6 should of had a sluggish fb in toast
cgair 7 good goal dunno why taken off
Dykes 4 can take a penalty but he’s garbage
Thomas 1 waste of a contract from what I seen of him
Bonne no comment didn’t touch ball
Warburton 6 got a point v a poor side
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Macca View Post
Agree but he will produce it's not good enough with the poor crosses that come in, he would have to have a neck as long as a giraffe.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
If you knew QPR would play another five seasons like this one, flirting at times with relegation but never seriously with the playoffs, what would u do today re MW, formations, and the players?
What would u keep, what would u lose, and what would u refuse to accept?
Comment
-
How the F uck people on here say Dykes is garbage when the service is absolutely appalling, when he gets a chance its almost his first touch of the game, but I agree he should have done better with his chance, he ain't going to score many with the system we play no good getting a chance once in a blue moon, and most of our players can't cross a decent ball.
Comment
-
If anyone had any doubts before this game what Warburton's ambition for this season are they will know now( avoid relegation),this was a game to be won,and Warburton played for a point .
chair was running the show but he takes him off .on a positive I felt Carroll had a really good game .
- Likes 1
Comment
-
In reflection it’s a point, they were poor but we still relied on Diengs handling which if we’d had Lumley I think we would of lost so a positive there.
the midfield is poor really poor, Dykes needs to step up and take chances and service to him needs to be better and quicker
kakay wouldn’t have crossed the pools coupon tonight woeful
nico gave Romero too much space imo defends too narrow
Not sure what Cameron offers if I’m honest
Need some players in jan and boot some out
Still at least didn’t get beat
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rebel R's View PostIf anyone had any doubts before this game what Warburton's ambition for this season are they will know now( avoid relegation),this was a game to be won,and Warburton played for a point .
chair was running the show but he takes him off .on a positive I felt Carroll had a really good game .
Comment
-
Originally posted by shaggy24 View PostRatings for Romford
Dieng 8 good handling
kakay 5 did ok but can’t cross but
Dickie 7 solid enough
Barbet 7 solid enough
nico 6 gets dragged into wrong position but marked decent player
Cameron 5 non existent
Ball 6 did ok more mobile than Cameron
carroll 6 moved it well enough but so slow
Bos 6 should of had a sluggish fb in toast
cgair 7 good goal dunno why taken off
Dykes 4 can take a penalty but he’s garbage
Thomas 1 waste of a contract from what I seen of him
Bonne no comment didn’t touch ball
Warburton 6 got a point v a poor side
Warburton bangs on about how tired the players are then plays the same players, not sure where we go from here, seemed to have signed a few duds in the summer.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shaggy24 View PostIn reflection it’s a point, they were poor but we still relied on Diengs handling which if we’d had Lumley I think we would of lost so a positive there.
the midfield is poor really poor, Dykes needs to step up and take chances and service to him needs to be better and quicker
kakay wouldn’t have crossed the pools coupon tonight woeful
nico gave Romero too much space imo defends too narrow
Not sure what Cameron offers if I’m honest
Need some players in jan and boot some out
Still at least didn’t get beat
Comment
-
Originally posted by Romford Hoop View Post
I’m really glad u did the marks tonight, I personally could not be bothered, 2 terrible teams and a game we could have won if we had played an attacking team.
Warburton bangs on about how tired the players are then plays the same players, not sure where we go from here, seemed to have signed a few duds in the summer.
Kane I’m amazed he’s a pro
Thomas well is he in McDonald’s manager scheme he’s not as fit as me at 51
Wallace past it played in Micky mouse league
Albert nice as he’s a fan but come on legs gone
I look at a side that’s wasting salary on the above and we could of got better imo or should have better
As for Warburton I’m not advocating sack him on the basis the squads rubbish and he has got at times decent football out of bang average players so stick with as klopp wouldn’t do much better but he would have more than plan a
Comment
-
Well that really was worth watching glad I went to my brothers house to watch it!
seriously, that was shite as I expected when I saw the team. MW really hasn’t got a clue. Practically the same 11 bar Kane and Willock and the same crappy performance as seen a few times already this season.
yes, he lacks ambition and picked a team to draw or nick a win rather than really have a go. As for his substitutions, doh!!!
I feel for Dykes, yes he should have done better with his chance, but he is feeding on scraps and has no support. We can only really judge him when he has a striker alongside him or more supply from the wings. But of course he won’t get these with MW and his plan A followed by ... another version of plan A.
Still, no doubt he will be in charge for another opportunity to lose a game on Saturday.
Comment
Comment