On way home | QPR 1 Fulham 2

[Leweshoop]

Still completely naffltto how we lost that game

[72bus]

Still completely naffltto how we lost that game

we lost because our strikers head wide over and shoot past the posts and powder puff shots , bidwells chance 1st half why did he side foot it , put your foot thru it man

[Greg1882]

we lost because our strikers head wide over and shoot past the posts and powder puff shots , bidwells chance 1st half why did he side foot it , put your foot thru it man

Yep. In a nutshell

[LoftusRoadLad]

The 3 in the middle is all we got really. Anyone noticed Luongo putting on weight ? Looked mighty big to me ?

[acricketer]

We have a weak defence and no attack. How was the result baffling?

[Romford Hoop]

We have a weak defence and no attack. How was the result baffling?

I thought we created more than them and for last 15 minutes they were hanging on, draw overall would have been a fair result, a defeat was harsh.

[acricketer]

We were all over them in injury time, two goals down, I'll give you that.

[vespa]

I thought we created more than them and for last 15 minutes they were hanging on, draw overall would have been a fair result, a defeat was harsh.

yes defeat was harsh ,mainly because it was from those c unts , if we played like that away from home ,we`d all agree it was three points well deserved, we were the better team in the first half and the last 15 minutes of the second . but they came ,and done a job on us, weve got to look at their tactics/gamesmanship if you like, and learn from it .
Gobby little pricks on the train back to Clapham too ,only until they realised we were Rangers mind !

[Timmy the Doc]

I thought we created more than them and for last 15 minutes they were hanging on, draw overall would have been a fair result, a defeat was harsh.

I think we played well, but surely they had more chances than us?

[lymehoop]

never good to lose to them, but from the maulings we've had from them in the past I thought there wasn't much difference between the two teams

[West Acton]

never good to lose to them, but from the maulings we've had from them in the past I thought there wasn't much difference between the two teams

That was my feeling mate usually leave this fixture early to avoid myself getting nicked as there fans are taking the #### but we worked hard yesterday just came up short.

Would add I don't think Fulham are half as good as some are making out decent side no more though and I'm not convinced they will finish top six. When you think how superior they have been over us last few years, and they have been we can't deny that, and you look at yesterday's game we have got remarkably better or they have gone backwards think truth is bit of both

[Ramsgate Hoop]

If we had Charlie Austin in this team tonight, we win but a coupe of clear goals

I think we create enough, we're just not good enough to put the ball in the back of the net.

I don't personally think wingbacks works for us. I'm actually think Bidwell is not as bad as made out, he just doesn't contribute going forward because it's not his position. Same as Pav, it's not his position. The midfield 3 of Scowen, Mass and Freeman is fantastic to watch.

We've been crying out for a decent right back for ages, Pav isn't that. I think he's great, but he doesn't take his man on anymore. He's better playing off the last defender not coming from deep. This formation doesn't suit him and it doesn't suit Yeni or LuaLua either.

[Tarbie]

If we had Charlie Austin in this team tonight, we win but a coupe of clear goals

I think we create enough, we're just not good enough to put the ball in the back of the net.

I don't personally think wingbacks works for us. I'm actually think Bidwell is not as bad as made out, he just doesn't contribute going forward because it's not his position. Same as Pav, it's not his position. The midfield 3 of Scowen, Mass and Freeman is fantastic to watch.

We've been crying out for a decent right back for ages, Pav isn't that. I think he's great, but he doesn't take his man on anymore. He's better playing off the last defender not coming from deep. This formation doesn't suit him and it doesn't suit Yeni or LuaLua either.

A lot of us fans can see it mate. 3 at the back isn't the answer with this group of players. Doesn't really suit any of our defensive players or our wingers. In fact, I'd say Perch (RCB) and Grant Hall (CB) are about the only 2 players in our squad that I'd actually want to see playing in a back 5.

We have a squad well suited to 4-4-2 or 4-5-1, with 2 specialist left backs, just about enough at right back between Perch and Furlong, and we have good options on either wing in front of them. These wingers are more or less obsolete when we play with wing backs.

Unfortunately I think that Ollie has set his stall out to play with wing backs, and aside from the occasional game where he might switch things up, I think we will just have to live with it.

[Shania]

Pawel is a winger, not a wingback. Square pegs in round holes.

[davieqpr]

Bidwell is also not quick enough for a wingback. Lynch was very poor. A slow centre back can compensate with a good positional sense but he doesn't have this. Midfield three were not quite firing.Playing out of position is affecting Pav.
Mackie up front offers nothing but fouls. Smith can win but not direct a header. Sylla goes to ground to easy. Obstinate Ollie must start changing things.