If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
He was a berk..my worlds a better place this morning without him :-)
...and your world is effected for the better by some random bloke on a football forum who is now banned - that makes your world better does it? Wow, that's some shallow world you must inhabit!....
...and your world is effected for the better by some random bloke on a football forum who is now banned - that makes your world better does it? Wow, that's some shallow world you must inhabit!....
...and your world is effected for the better by some random bloke on a football forum who is now banned - that makes your world better does it? Wow, that's some shallow world you must inhabit!....
EXACTLY my thought (spelling correction turned off, i warn you)... i want marshy back, he s a harmless qpr fan no need for banning, this is the democratic republic of north qpr...not a faschist website...deep, ok deep deep down marshy is a good caring fan...and i want him back
He was abusive to the last, he just could not help it, that is why his ban was expedited. Some people just might get carried away sometimes, but to him insulting fellow-posters seems to come naturally. And since then we have received several long e-mails from him that have not done him any favours, either.
Exactly, didn't even have the decency to wait for the poll results before BULLYING other people AGAIN
I think Marshy improved his manners and was wrongly banned. He did contribute to this forum by posting lots of interesting thoughts and links to news I would not have read otherwise. I do not remember what he did in the past but the last few weeks he was a good poster IMO and therefore he should be judged by that. He probably got infarcations points before but served them so that is in the past.
The last few threads he started were good. Yet people attacked him, insulting him, going offtopic, ridiculed him again and again. These posters did not seem to get infarction points even though they broke the rules. And Marshy was banned. Is that fair? No.
I hope whoever voted for him to get banned did not do so because they disagreed with him or because of all of his threads that got hijacked. That would be a shame and IMO unjust.
Just because Marshy thinks that maybe Mackie should be tested as a CM does not mean it is meant to be inflammatory. If people take it the wrong way it is under no circumstances Marshys fault. To think otherwise is IMO wrong.
People have been far more so, just not for such a prolonged period, or so deliberately.
His own fault he's gone, it's just the manner in which it was done which was distasteful IMO.
The gloating is expected but fairly crass too.
But he didn't even wait for the poll results, just resorted to type !
Anyone who couldn't see him for what he was is 'clueless' ( to quote his own words )
And that is another MYTH BUSTED
"Steve, do you think 25k is a good option when there are indications that within four years, new stadiums on average have increased attendances of 60%? For us that would mean around 29k."
Exactly, didn't even have the decency to wait for the poll results before BULLYING other people AGAIN
Bit early for the chemicals ain't it ?
But he didn't even wait for the poll results, just resorted to type !
Anyone who couldn't see him for what he was is 'clueless' ( to quote his own words )
And that is another MYTH BUSTED
i thought it was destroyed, dismissed simpletons and if we dont play adel we will lose at sunderland and be relegated. Fact!...because i analyse the game unlike most here.
i thought it was destroyed, dismissed simpletons
and if we dont play adel we will lose at sunderland and be relegated. Fact!...because i analyse the game unlike most here.
You could be right, it could be MYTH DESTROYED but unlike Marshy, I can't be arshed trawling though old posts to see who's correct ;-}
"Steve, do you think 25k is a good option when there are indications that within four years, new stadiums on average have increased attendances of 60%? For us that would mean around 29k."
...and your world is effected for the better by some random bloke on a football forum who is now banned - that makes your world better does it? Wow, that's some shallow world you must inhabit!....
Comment