Harry theory

[silvercue]

WOW - What a difference.

Pathetic, sorry no dig. Just fed up

One minute Granero is **** this **** that (Play derry at least he plays well etc)

Now its, get rid of old man Derry again

Although it isn't my team - it is the area I would want to see it. I have been very consistant on my views about Derry for a long time - he is not good enough and nor is Mackie - again I have always been the same on Mackie. Grafters and effort don't win - talent does.

I know they are popular with many fans, but no room for me. Especially not room with Derry as one of 2 defensive mids - not got the legs for it. And Makcie can't play on his own up front at all - not just talent wise, but he doesn't have the discipline. He chases back so he isn't there when we need to pass it to him!

[Del]

To add, most people have said that Granero has been poor along with SWP

Sooo... in a nutshell, you cant ****ing win. Makes me laugh... madness

I wouldnt say MOST people have said Granero's been poor... some have, not the majority. To many it's been obvious he's got quality and should be playing..... Blimey, you don't play 60 matches for Real Madrid over the last 2 years and then not be good enough to play for a failing QPR side.

[Del]

All ******** Del,

All ****ing stupid, one minute Bothroyd can leave next minute you want him etc etc

Bores me... Harry played the team who have recently done so well

Get over yourself.

You're using random opinions from others, not me, then suggesting i'm contradicting by saying Bothroyd should play etc .

Obviously you know best and think Mackie is a better option up front what with his 2 in 20+ games, the same as Luke Young had last season when RB....

[qpr4life]

Get over yourself.

You're using random opinions from others, not me, then suggesting i'm contradicting by saying Bothroyd should play etc .

Obviously you know best and think Mackie is a better option up front what with his 2 in 20+ games, the same as Luke Young had last season when RB....

hahaha - Del without this getting personal...

No not at all.. In that case, I appologise if you have never said the likes of Bothroyd etc are not wanted at QPR anymore.

My opinion stays the same, whoever is here deserves a chance to be considered and play.

Others are better and therefore will feature more.

I think Harry knows he has a very average squad and the style and formation he believes will get most points is this.

I dont think Hughes can be blamed much either, the players never performed and thats why they achieved four points.

My point is, Harry has a formation now and needs to find the right mix with what he has.

[stanistheman]

Zamora was fit enough to play Saturday and against Norwich, hence on the bench. He cant play 90 mins, fine, so play until he can and then replace like for like with Bothroyd who was brilliant recently at West Brom. Both target strikers who are much better suited than Mackie and Taarabt repsectively in his 4231 preference.

Also Granero was fit and not used until too late on Saturday.

SWP has been playing excellently under Harry since he arrived yet suddenly bombed out while Mackie who consistently offers nothing stays in the team.

The team that started the 2nd half Sat should've started the match to perhaps let us get a foothold in the match and have a chance of winning, rather than waiting until after the games almost lost, and we have to risk leaving ourselves open while chasing a deficit as was the case.

Harry has fuc%ed up with his selection and tactics in the last two games. Not sure why you refuse to accept that.

I agree that Redknapp should have sent out a more attacking side to begin with.
and if he feels that Zamora is not fit to start them start with Bothroyd and play either Tarrabt or maybe Mackie alongside or close to him for support.

Taarabt on Saturday and Mackie last week were left up front isolated and QPR failed to score or ebven create much in both 1st halves.

Redknapp needs to show some more attacking intent if QPR are to mount any sort of fight to climb out of the bottom 3.

[march56]

bottom line is we are s hit!

[qpr4life]

bottom line is we are s hit!

Brilliant

[Del]

I agree that Redknapp should have sent out a more attacking side to begin with.
and if he feels that Zamora is not fit to start them start with Bothroyd and play either Tarrabt or maybe Mackie alongside or close to him for support.

Taarabt on Saturday and Mackie last week were left up front isolated and QPR failed to score or ebven create much in both 1st halves.

Redknapp needs to show some more attacking intent if QPR are to mount any sort of fight to climb out of the bottom 3.

The annoying thing is he was renowned for this style at Spurs and they played best with pacy wingers in a 4411 or 442. We have ideal players for both styles and front 6 could be either

SWP.......Granero.....Mbia.....Townsend
...........................Taarabt
...................Remy

Or

SWP.....Granero....Mbia.....Taarabt
..............Remy.....Zamora

[Snaxo]

If that's Harry's approach then we are truly stuffed as their are 19 teams better than us, and pretty much all expected to beat us right now ! :O

[Wolfy]

His tactics have been bazaar to say the least. I am not a big DJ fan but you keep him and play him if you do not have anyone else. There has to be more to it with DJ and Harry.

[Del]

His tactics have been bazaar to say the least. I am not a big DJ fan but you keep him and play him if you do not have anyone else. There has to be more to it with DJ and Harry.

Not sure there is other than he clearly doesn't fancy some players, and hasn't given them a look in and has signed ones he knows. Fact is we were desperate for strikers with injuries etc and he didnt play recognised strikers evern though we had 2 fit in Bothroyd and DJ and one about 70 % in Zamora.... all better options than Adel or Mackie as lone front man.

If your starving to death and found a plate of food you didnt' like, would you ignore it and die, or eat it to survive.....?

[WeAreQPR12]

What part of Dels post is ******? As far as I can see its a pretty spot on post?

the bit where he would play m'bia, I really think he is a steve Palmer type, all heart and no ability. It fine for league 1 but we can't afford his **** poor distribution

[qblockoompah]

Currently, availability permitting i'd have:

...................Cesar
Onouha....Samba...Hill...Fabio
SWP.....Granero...Mbia...Taarabt
...........Remy...Zamora


Or if 4231 as Harry seems to prefer:

.......................Cesar
Onouha.....Samba....Hill.....Fabio
.............Mbia.......Diakite
SWP..............Granero.......Taarabt
......................Remy

Agreed

[qpr4life]

What part of Dels post is ******? As far as I can see its a pretty spot on post?

I find it ******** for different reasons of which some I missunderstood

May view is - I dislike the fans who cant stand SWP etc and wont them gone, but then next minute love them again...

I didnt know Del was genuine and hadn't been posting stuff like this, most of the board have.

I thought it was an unnecessary dig at Harry tbh - Of which now I accept his opinion and move on. It was a fair comment, and I can take that.

I cant take people having a pop at Harry saying play Bothroyd or SWP when last week they said those players are terrible and to play Derry and Mackie. (If this makes any sense haha)

[Shania]

It seems like I´m the only Bothroyd "fan" on here. I feel he is a confidence player, and should have been given more game time. He was so dangerous when he played for Cardiff, and despite the fact, it was in the championship, he should be given a go in an attackminded formation.