Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Redknapp Has to take the blame

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Redknapp Has to take the blame

    Just seen his press conference, the buck stops with him, that was a awful side he put out, he has to play Granero every game the only creative midfield player we have Jenas is not the answer we should have kept Faurlin, Derry is not the answer, Mackie just a impact sub, he should know what players he should play he has had enough games to see what he has got, and Fernandes and the rest of the board should be asking why we were so negative, he should not be putting down to no strikers, Harry should have been playing BZ from the start not coming on when it's too late, get some goals on the board first then take him off, I just can't see what we gain by bringing him on later, just seems stupid to do that can't see what it gains.

    Comment


    • #47
      er bz cant play 30mins!
      you know nothing john snow!!!!

      Comment


      • #48
        just got back from one of the worst away trips I've suffered in 51 years. We were spineless, gutless, shapeless, toothless and useless.
        Harry inherited a mess and he did try and buy strikers in the window. BZ and Remy would be ok together at this level. Bothroyd is not a prem player and anyone out there who thinks he is up to it, is sorely mistaken. He wan't much cop in the championship.Without strkers, it's very difficult. Mackie runs around and makes some effort but with very little qualty or end product. Tarbs has the sole task of trying to make things happen and can't do it on his own.
        I agree with all of you that we appear to be negative but we don't have the FIT players to attack teams.
        We play United in a fortnight and then it's March. Our top scorer will have 4 goals going into March. Tells it's own story, doesn't it?
        I'm not a quitter and would never admit it's over but to get 6 wins from 12 games, when we've had 2 from 26 games IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN.
        maybe going down would actually do some good. If Harry stayed, he could start again, get us up and we'd be stronger.
        Realistically that is looking like our best option.
        Don't know what deals our 4/5 better players have but if they are on contracts, we don't have to sell them.
        Hope Harry's threw a few of the culprits off the Severn Bridge on the way home

        Comment


        • #49
          If he can play for the first half only, at least we will be more positive from the start, we already know that BZ will not be able to come out for the second half, but don't bring him on after the match is lost.

          Comment


          • #50
            Suppose we go 2 down with BZ.....then what ? Take him off ?

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by LoftusRoadLad View Post
              Suppose we go 2 down with BZ.....then what ? Take him off ?
              Yes, we are suppose to be sound defensively, go all out first have, get a goal or two, lol, then play in the break second half!
              Kept the faith!

              Comment


              • #52
                The key problem QPR never managed to solve whether under Mark Hughes or Harry Redknapp is defensive football. Yes Harry has improved our defence, but we are still struggling to create opportunities. That's why we have scored the lowest number of goals. We all saw how defensive football conceded us 4 goals yesterday. Some may argue we have no strikers. No we had Bothroyd as a fit striker. We could have started him with Mackie and then bring Zamora who is not 100% fit or the other way. Don’t have a go at Mackie when there is no holding striker around him. Yes we lack quality, but when are bottom you need to take risk. There is too much pressure on Taarabt. To through him upfront isn’t fair. He isn’t striker. We shouldn't have let DJ Campbell go. When we had Remy, we struggled to create opportunities and we all saw how West Ham dominated the game. So the problem isn’t lack of strikers. A good manager will always sort out a good way and still play attacking football, but the same old problem is we are still not ready to take risk and attack especially when we need to do so to score goals to stay up rather and sitting back.
                Last edited by Yousef; 10-02-2013, 12:26 PM.
                QPR fan since1987

                @yousef_qpr

                Comment


                • #53
                  Its Hughes, and Flavio and Bernie's doing really. I exonerate Warnock, Redknapp and largely Fernandes. Others may disagree. If Warnock had been backed by FB & BE in the first place we'd probably be where Swansea, WBA, West Ham, Norwich etc are now.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Starting to wonder why we are all hoping Harry stays with us if we get relegated anyway? Unless he changes he tactics and goes for the wins we need then whats the point in him? Hughes could have parked the bus I imagine.

                    Even if we lose games it would be good to see the boys going down with all guns blazing. I love HR but im worried about his tactics/ player choice with our situation.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X