If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Pellicori is a big fella.Only seen him against Forest so would take a chance on him.Helgusson just looks like a man who's numbers came up on the lottery and forgot to buy a ticket when he is playing.
i'm with stan bowles on this
Running the London Marathon for the Down's Syndrome Association....
Yeah I would also go along with that.
I don't rate pellicori but he could work with simpson and he is worth a try.
U also can't knock his effort which is something u can question Helguson about.
Blimey, how many chances does HH need... he is beyond pants and should be kept out of the team. If we want a hold up player to play alongside Simpson in a conventional front two, then Pellicori should be given a chance and run in the first team, otherwise why buy the bloke, if we want someone to drop a bit deeper and link in with the midfield better then we should play Vine.
I think our problem is the strikers have not confidence. I would try something new, 3 up front, i know we do not have many strikers but if we stuck simpson and balanta up front with vine/helg/agy, we could possibly give our strikers some confidence if they scored a few goals, obviously we may have problems in the middle of the field,
id go 433...........cerny....borrowdale.....gorkks....co nnolly....rampage.......fraulin.....rowlands....bu zsacky.......routledge....vine......simpson!!
Comment