If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
problem is all the teams that are imploding have quite a cushion over us - not saying we can't catch teams like West Ham but its going to take something pretty phenomenal.
Didn't look like they were imploding when they rained in 46 crosses against us.
Hardly any quality in that though is there.... lump it in from anywhere and try your luck, if it drops play it wide and lump it in again... etc etc etc and repeat.
The fact we kept giving them back the ball to lump it in again and again says it all.
Hardly any quality in that though is there.... lump it in from anywhere and try your luck, if it drops play it wide and lump it in again... etc etc etc and repeat.
The fact we kept giving them back the ball to lump it in again and again says it all.
very little quality indeed, but still too good for us...
Their imploding that much that we couldn't beat them and they battered us in the 2nd half. they'll be safe? home form and the most unattractive football I've seen in years will keep them up1
West Ham away from home are defending really deep which just suits Arsenal to a tee. Add to that, last night Fat Sam didn't play Cole, Diame and another (forget which) of their first choice line up that played us. They are a different proposition at home. Still, as usual people sneer at what was a good point for us and suggest that we have a divine right to beat them away because they got done at the Emirates without considering any of the contributory factors. And can we get over the stat about these 10 million crosses on Saturday please - I still have whiplash :rage: Oh and how many of them lead to goals?? Lump it - ave it, the Fat Sam way
Comment