45 of the 46 were well defended. Our midfield failed to stop such crosses because our not having the ball meant that West Ham had it and could produce.... 46 crosses. Harry knows what's wrong. He said so in plain words after the game: we need to keep the ball and play. He'll bring in players to do that.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
46 crosses...
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Hitman34 View Postshyte game, was ****ing freezing, keeper was class, defence was rock solid, midfield was shyte, remy took his goal well but was unable to make an impact in the second half due to the shyte we had in midfield.'Only a Ranger!' cried Gandalf. 'My dear Frodo, that is just what the Rangers are: the last remnant in the South of the great people, the Men of West London.' - Lord of the Rings, Book II, Chapter I - Many Meetings.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gipper View Postcahonas. Think you mean cajones ???. Know what you men though
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by paulmason View PostIf we set up like we did v Spurs in the second half, they would not have had half the crosses. Putting Remy on the right was suicidal and thats where the majority of them cam from in the 2nd half. Play him up front or don't play him at all.
Comment
-
Originally posted by paulmason View PostIf we set up like we did v Spurs in the second half, they would not have had half the crosses. Putting Remy on the right was suicidal and thats where the majority of them cam from. Play him up front or don't play him at all.
Comment
-
Originally posted by paulmason View PostIf we set up like we did v Spurs in the second half, they would not have had half the crosses. Putting Remy on the right was suicidal and thats where the majority of them cam from. Play him up front or don't play him at all.I played sunday league football today.
Clearly I was the best player on the pitch.
I scored 5 and made 7 last ditch tackles.
We lost 5-0 but the rest of my team were sh it!
Comment
-
Originally posted by fisnik View PostI wonder if that was the plan. Let them get in and around our box and then maybe get hold of the second ball and catch them on the break.
Comment
-
Originally posted by vblockranger View Posttut tut tut he's lucky twranger is in bed, terrible grammar.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ahR View PostOr that meathead Davef over on QPR.org... Now that is one extremely sad indivual who is the most pedantic and critical poster imaginable.... The archetypal keyboard warrior posting dozens of posts a day with far too much time on his hands... I suspect that he lives in a one one bedsit or still at home with his elderly parents and wanders around the house in oversized grimey Y-fronts and a gravy stained Onslow string vest.... The original grammar Ghestapo.....
Comment
-
We got deeper and deeper and I think it stemmed from Cesar getting the ball forward too quick.
I get it that we wanted to hit them on the break, and it worked for our goal, but it creates a big problem when we lose possession because our defence hasn't got up the pitch far enough. It then sets a pattern, and we we're consistantly caught too deep.
Full backs are supposed to stop the crosses, and I thought Onouha and Fabio had poor games, Fabio especially. I watched the game again this morning, and he's a ball watcher almost in the Anton mode. And we are really going to miss Nelson when he goes, closes down shots so fast, best defender we have.
I think we should play a more compressed formation to keep the game tighter, especially while we still have Nelson who has the pace to cover for Clint. There's too much space between Remy and Tarbs and the rest of the midfield.
Comment
Comment