do you not think that Marseille may have asked for the fee to be undisclosed. They turned down a lot of money (apparently) for Remy last season, to disclose that they sold him for half the amount might have upset some of their fans, who are not short of an opinion or two. Its no secret most of the time how much has been paid for a player, someone brought up in this thread though that transfers are never as easy as just passing $1m to the other team, usually it would be paid over so many years with a fee up front and then bonuses etc etc. I can understand why a buying club might not want their business strategy laid out to everyone to see. Better for them if its just reported to be 'in the region of $1m etc.
I do miss the simplicity of old school up front transfers, but its really not that hard to find out the rough figure paid and how its paid doesn't really interest me one jot.
I think in Europe more transfers are disclosed for tax reasons which demand full disclosure of finances which are not apparent when selling to an English club but I might be a bit out on this one
anyway, no need for the vitriol of this thread, the OP needs to respect other people's opinions.
I do miss the simplicity of old school up front transfers, but its really not that hard to find out the rough figure paid and how its paid doesn't really interest me one jot.
I think in Europe more transfers are disclosed for tax reasons which demand full disclosure of finances which are not apparent when selling to an English club but I might be a bit out on this one
anyway, no need for the vitriol of this thread, the OP needs to respect other people's opinions.
Comment