For Spurs - use the same line up that beat CFC please

[zeberdee]

33 Cesar
06 Hill
15 Onuoha
17 Nelsen
20 Fabio
04 Derry
10 Taarabt
14 Granero
40 M'bia
12 Mackie
23 Hoilett (SWP)

No changes in players or formation. No excuses for not turning up. If they get even a draw then it means CFC was not just a one off.
Making changes just makes excuses for failing.

[SpankwiR]

agreed 100%

[Captain Planet]

Can't see anyone arguing with that. Against Chelsea was the most organised our defense has looked all season.

We are gonna have to play out of our skins to get anything though. Spurs are looking deadly going forward.

[Olly]

And our fans will be deadlier. Let's roar them on for back to back league wins

[qpr4life]

33 Cesar
06 Hill
15 Onuoha
17 Nelsen
20 Fabio
04 Derry
10 Taarabt
14 Granero
40 M'bia
12 Mackie
23 Hoilett (SWP)

No changes in players or formation. No excuses for not turning up. If they get even a draw then it means CFC was not just a one off.
Making changes just makes excuses for failing.

100% - I would like to see Huddlestone or a younger Derry signed to fill in on his role. IMO -

[Rangers77]

Not sure about this. Great performanance at Chelsea, but that team was designed for playing Chelsea away; to soak up pressure and try to hit them on the counter. We have, however, to try to score goals on Saturday, so will need much more punch up front (if we can have more punch up front in our present squad...). As solid as the team at Chelsea was, it didn't offer that. Dudley in for Holliet with Adel on the left of midfield.

[ollyhoops]

I would change Hoilett (who is injured) for DJ Cambell as we need goals.

[RussRanger]

Haha, no chance of raiding Spurs for their talent before the game, I suppose? :evilish:

[SuperHoopNik]

I think it's too defensive, should only be used away from home at tough places to go where we can sit back and counter. We could use the same formation, but with Adel in midfield and Mackie up front.

[vblockranger]

Have to change something to negate their speedy wingers...Lennon and Bale both in form

[MattyRangers]

Not sure about this. Great performanance at Chelsea, but that team was designed for playing Chelsea away; to soak up pressure and try to hit them on the counter. We have, however, to try to score goals on Saturday, so will need much more punch up front (if we can have more punch up front in our present squad...). As solid as the team at Chelsea was, it didn't offer that. Dudley in for Holliet with Adel on the left of midfield.

Agree with this regards needing to attack them but I think Adel is wasted out on the left.

[QPR1234]

Campbell in for hoillet.

[Rangers77]

Agree with this regards needing to attack them but I think Adel is wasted out on the left.

I agree. Adel, at his best, is usually better in the middle (if pushed further up front), but Granero can only play in the middle, not on the right, so its very difficult to have the two of them play in the same team if both are to be in the middle..... Adel has done well on the left- especially as he can drift in. A tough one. Its better off not playing Granero if he's not in the middle. I think, however, we'd benefit from him having a run in the team.

[MattyRangers]

I agree. Adel, at his best, is usually better in the middle (if pushed further up front), but Granero can only play in the middle, not on the right, so its very difficult to have the two of them play in the same team if both are to be in the middle..... Adel has done well on the left- especially as he can drift in. A tough one. Its better off not playing Granero if he's not in the middle. I think, however, we'd benefit from him having a run in the team.

Good post tbf. Have to admit I agree there in that I'd like to see Granero given some games, especially against the such footballing teams as Spurs.

[qpr4life]

Campbell in for hoillet.

Im not quite sure that works... Campbell is not a winger.

And therefore SWP is the likely replacement