I know he has worked hard, and set one up against Wigan, hit the post against Villa, and put in a beauty for Mackie against WBA, but the fact remains, he is sh1te. I am not making him a scapegoat here, I am just saying, he cannot take people on, his first touch is appalling, and he keeps running the ball out. Why don't we play Hoilett instead, who always looks more dangerous, can shoot better, has better link up play with others, and can dribble with the ball? If Hughes was playing SWP, we'd be moaning, so why has SWP become a Harry favourite? Why is Harry not starting Hoilett? This cannot continue.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why are we tolerating SWP?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Fraggy View PostI think he is tolerated as he is one of the few that looks like they are trying to bust a gut out there.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dave58 View PostWe are tolerating SWP the same as we are tolerating Taarabt . Adel was as poor as anyone today lost count how many times he lost or gave the ball away
Because although he was very poor in the first half, in the second, he did ten times more than SWP did and at least he always had two Liverpool players surrounding him. Who did SWP have marking him?
Comment
-
I have never rated him, when he made his debut i thought im actually wrong but apart from a few flashes i think hes one of the worst signings we've ever made. Lacks in everything, i actually hate him and he epitomises everything i hate about the club at the moment. He hides, he makes poor decisions constantly i can go on and on. How he got 30+ England caps is beyond me??? Weve certainly had worse players than him but hes just living off a name now
Comment
-
Originally posted by dave58 View PostWe are tolerating SWP the same as we are tolerating Taarabt . Adel was as poor as anyone today lost count how many times he lost or gave the ball away
SWP should have gone a long time ago.
Comment
Comment