Disagree Benny. I think his best position would be as a play maker in a free role. The guy is class and knows when to play the right pass at the right time, please take note Tarrabt. He is also our best technical player and has a superb strike on him. While we don't have 1 good striker at the moment I think he should play just behind Helguson. My opinion could change and he could do a very good job as a centre mid by while we can't score goals I see him as our greateat threat further up the pitch. Fraulin and Legs can continue in the middle. I can't see the point of playing 2 big men upfront with no pace. It just didn't work. I thought the italian Pellicori worked hard but did very little to impress me. Helguson needs competition, so lets hope we at least sign 1 striker if not 2. We are crying out for a striker with pace who can score. Not really had 1 since the Ferdinand days.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
play buszaky up front
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by WeAreQPR12 View PostDisagree Benny. I think his best position would be as a play maker in a free role. The guy is class and knows when to play the right pass at the right time, please take note Tarrabt. He is also our best technical player and has a superb strike on him. While we don't have 1 good striker at the moment I think he should play just behind Helguson. My opinion could change and he could do a very good job as a centre mid by while we can't score goals I see him as our greateat threat further up the pitch. Fraulin and Legs can continue in the middle. I can't see the point of playing 2 big men upfront with no pace. It just didn't work. I thought the italian Pellicori worked hard but did very little to impress me. Helguson needs competition, so lets hope we at least sign 1 striker if not 2. We are crying out for a striker with pace who can score. Not really had 1 since the Ferdinand days.
Putting him up front is a waste.Your mum would love me...
Comment
Comment