I think it all boils down to the fact the comment was made about the player they support, had it been said about Hill for example, they wouldnt bat an eyelid.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The thread to end all threads about Koreans following particular football players
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
That is why, when dealing with the written word, if you find something offensive it is often best to qualify it out by questioning the communicator first, to see if the offence was meant or whether it was simply poor communication or a lack of cultural understanding (the dog**** comment for example). If it's the latter, the person offended does have to be prepared to understand the culture of the person who made it and the fact that to them it has no such offensive meaning.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Snaxo View PostThat is why, when dealing with the written word, if you find something offensive it is often best to qualify it out by questioning the communicator first, to see if the offence was meant or whether it was simply poor communication or a lack of cultural understanding (the dog**** comment for example). If it's the latter, the person offended does have to be prepared to understand the culture of the person who made it and the fact that to them it has no such offensive meaning.
Comment
-
Originally posted by vblockranger View PostBut why would any of this happen? there has been no racist reports when Koreans or anyone else has visited the ground? And i stress using the word dog**** is not a racist comment in this country and is not used with racial undertones in any post present on this forum. Why do you see racism when there isnt any? i think its a weakness in certain cultures (and no i am not being racist...sigh)
@ Snaxo, thanks for your posts. I know that intent cannot be proven nor forum policy enforced when the intent is not clear, I was just riled up because I'm being told that something said with racist intention cannot be classified a racist remark as long as it's in a different language forum, even when malicious racist intent was clearly there.
Comment
-
Originally posted by NortholtRanger View PostI agree mate, the way seoul man went about it accusing him of being a racist on the original thread was the wrong way to go about it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Joon View Postvblockranger, you said in a post above that you have never used the term ******** with racist intent and I believe you. Your word is good enough for me. I knew that you yourself most likely did not mean it with malicious intent, but it's another thing to say that it would still not have been a racist remark even if you meant it to be. Ask all persons who experienced racism, it's all about intent.
@ Snaxo, thanks for your posts. I know that intent cannot be proven nor forum policy enforced when the intent is not clear, I was just riled up because I'm being told that something said with racist intention cannot be classified a racist remark as long as it's in a different language forum, even when malicious racist intent was clearly there.
Comment
-
Originally posted by vblockranger View Postand just to clear the air again...In no way was my use of the word dog**** meant to confer racial undertones. And again in no way does my further use of the word dog**** contain any kind of racist undertones towards anybody. Its a word used in everyday language especially after my missus attempts her Lasagne recipe. :-)
Besides, I've hardly seen a korean eaten dog. If we are to talk about dog-eating, whale-eating, insects-eating, shark-eating etc, theres no end to it.
Comment
-
To call a spade a spade
It is evident that the word spade refers to the instrument used to move earth, a very common tool.
It may originate from etnicity, but it aint meant that way, and few people understand its origin!
However it is part of our language, "i dig the garden with a spade."
No i havent got a black bloke helping me!
ITS A SPADE!
AND THIS TOPIC IS DOG****E!
Whatever that means!!!
“Hating people because of their color is wrong. And it doesn't matter which color does the hating. It's just plain wrong.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by Joon View Postvblockranger, you said in a post above that you have never used the term ******** with racist intent and I believe you. Your word is good enough for me. I knew that you yourself most likely did not mean it with malicious intent, but it's another thing to say that it would still not have been a racist remark even if you meant it to be. Ask all persons who experienced racism, it's all about intent.
@ Snaxo, thanks for your posts. I know that intent cannot be proven nor forum policy enforced when the intent is not clear, I was just riled up because I'm being told that something said with racist intention cannot be classified a racist remark as long as it's in a different language forum, even when malicious racist intent was clearly there.
Comment
-
Originally posted by swivvler View PostTo call a spade a spade
It is evident that the word spade refers to the instrument used to move earth, a very common tool.
It may originate from etnicity, but it aint meant that way, and few people understand its origin!
However it is part of our language, "i dig the garden with a spade."
No i havent got a black bloke helping me!
ITS A SPADE!
AND THIS TOPIC IS DOG****E!
Whatever that means!!!
“Hating people because of their color is wrong. And it doesn't matter which color does the hating. It's just plain wrong.”
We all share the same colour, blue hoops
Comment
-
Originally posted by NortholtRanger View PostSo joon you now understand that if the word is used to describe the performance, or lack of, of a player (including Park) it is not intended as offensive to any particular person other than the player?
So, no. It is not true that the word ******** is never a racist remark. It is not a racist remark when simply describing the performance of a player. However, when it is intentionally used with racist intentions to demean a player of a particular ethnicity (in this case Korean), it becomes a racist comment. Of course, on the internet it is difficult to determine one's intentions, as Snaxo pointed out and I concurred.
Are we clear? Or do you still think language trumps intent? Before you answer, please think about how many languages you speak fluently.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Joon View PostWe must be on a loop or something, because I think I made myself clear when I said even the most innocent or common of words can be used as a racist comment if the writer or speaker uses it with such intention.
So, no. It is not true that the word ******** is never a racist remark. It is not a racist remark when simply describing the performance of a player. However, when it is intentionally used with racist intentions to demean a player of a particular ethnicity (in this case Korean), it becomes a racist comment. Of course, on the internet it is difficult to determine one's intentions, as Snaxo pointed out and I concurred.
Are we clear? Or do you still think language trumps intent? Before you answer, please think about how many languages you speak fluently.
Comment
Comment