Being taken for mugs, by mugs? OLD THREADS MERGED

[Factamondo]

id say a pineapple boilie on a mono line hair rig with a nice number ten hook will surfice!!!

[stan_bowles]

we need a real winston churchillian type leader routledge my old partner in crime!!!.......get dave bassett in!!!

Doubt we could get Mike Bassett.

[Cogster]

fred bassett would be more the ticket

[qblockpete]

Top half definitely, a couple of strikers and definitely top 6 material. Only 4 games in, win next two games and everyone becomes a bit more optimistic. No denying we had easier teams to start with, but have blown a real chance to be near the top.

[W12_Ranger]

Top half definitely, a couple of strikers and definitely top 6 material. Only 4 games in, win next two games and everyone becomes a bit more optimistic. No denying we had easier teams to start with, but have blown a real chance to be near the top.

Depends who the strikers are and whether JM stops tinkering with our defence.

At the moment we are 12-18 in the league our form in the last half a season is actually relegation form, time to face up to the gravity of the situation.

We will not beat Scunny, Palace a draw? Peterborough first win maybe?

[qblockpete]

Could not agree more about the defence. its like our managers panic after a draw and tinker. Not sure if they are scared or trying to prove a point. Play your four best defenders whatever happens. I wouldn';t even change it after a loss, you need stability. Shirley, mixing it does not help.

[Yousef]

NO

[Fez]

No we need a couple of strikers and a full back IMO and even with that we need everybody to be performing and for confidence and morale to be high! Can't see all that happening this season.

[superckat]

Top half definitely, a couple of strikers and definitely top 6 material. Only 4 games in, win next two games and everyone becomes a bit more optimistic. No denying we had easier teams to start with, but have blown a real chance to be near the top.

Pete, last season you were convinced we had a top 6 team even without the strikers. You were blaming Sousa. You said the players were good enough. We have pretty much the same squad now. Sousa is no longer here, so why was the team good enough then but not good enough now.

[qpruleok]

when we can not keep clean sheets or forwards score goals its a recipe for disaster. We need a least six decent players to get in the top six. Forest yesterday should have been 3 up before our great strike yesterday. The way we are going bottom half is best we can finish unless their is a 100% improvement and our deadwood useless forwards start to score:anger::anger::anger::anger::anger::anger:

[3London]

just thought i would bump some of these older posts to the top

[3London]

bump bump bump

[qblockpete]

End of the day, we all have opinions.

Thats the beauty of it all.

[IsleworthRanger]

Well guys, I agree with all of you. I said so last season and this season. No way are we a top 6 team. Also no way is JM the right man for the job. But that's another issue altoghether.

The reason I asked the question was because last season, a certain person on here was telling everyone else would listen that we were a top 6 team and claimed that it was Sousa's fault that we didn't finish top 6. He posted thread after thread after thread about it and criticised anyone who disagreed.

That was with Buszacky, Vine, Rowlands and Agyemeng out. Now they're back and playing It seems strange that same person is now saying "if we are within touching distance of the top 6 early Jan, we will get in a number of players again" Then again this same person goes on about Tarrabt being a striker.

[qblockpete]

I like to think, I know a little more about football than Superckat