Originally posted by Marshy
View Post
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Harrys subs - wrong
Collapse
X
-
@gatorTFC
-
Originally posted by hh9 View PostGreen for Cesar forced because of groin injury - Green did well
Park for Diakite - wrong - should have been Derry
SWP for Taarabt - wrong - should have been Hoilett for Mackie
Taarabt just has to be on the field - only one to make something happen
It is obvious that HR does not like Taarabt
You obviously know nothing about football. Adel was taken off because he was getting lumps kicked out of him and the MANAGER want's him to be 100 percent fit for Saturday.
Go back to your playstation or whatever you play with.
Comment
-
The proof is in the pudding and we came away with a valuable point. So Harry must have done something right.'Only a Ranger!' cried Gandalf. 'My dear Frodo, that is just what the Rangers are: the last remnant in the South of the great people, the Men of West London.' - Lord of the Rings, Book II, Chapter I - Many Meetings.
Comment
-
We did break in numbers - mid 2nd half Traore sprinted forward on left wing and crossed....considering how much ground he had made so fast there were 4 QPR players waiting in the box and more not far off. We didn't get the rub of the green, still looked poor at corners at both ends (even when we have good delivery no one attacks well enough), but this can improve on the training ground.
Tarrbs did look worse 2nd half, but also did a lot of good stuff first half. As for SWP, he wasn't on for long, but he looked more lively than he has this season and it was good to see him get a shot off.
Not sure where the negativity is coming from. Said before the game 0-0 at Sunderland and 1-0 v Villa would be a superb start for Harry.
Comment
-
Originally posted by silvercue View PostWe did break in numbers - mid 2nd half Traore sprinted forward on left wing and crossed....considering how much ground he had made so fast there were 4 QPR players waiting in the box and more not far off. We didn't get the rub of the green, still looked poor at corners at both ends (even when we have good delivery no one attacks well enough), but this can improve on the training ground.
Tarrbs did look worse 2nd half, but also did a lot of good stuff first half. As for SWP, he wasn't on for long, but he looked more lively than he has this season and it was good to see him get a shot off.
Not sure where the negativity is coming from. Said before the game 0-0 at Sunderland and 1-0 v Villa would be a superb start for Harry.
Comment
-
Adel played well in the first half, everything was going through him. Second half he went a bit quite, started to look a bit tired also. IMO when Harry took him off he was happy to take the 0-0 as both teams didn't look like scoring even if the game went on for another 90mins. I expect him to start Saturday, and be the player at home who dictates the game and hopefully gets us the win. Last night he wasn't brilliant, nor poor, if we want to point fingers at poor players last night I would look more at matey boy from Real Madrid.@chrisrobson9
Comment
-
jesus christ what are we like ffs:angry:...arguing over substitutions now ffs get a grip people...our bench is hardly game changing now is it???....diakite had to come off before he ruined us again with yet another pathetic red card.....tarabbt was ineffective and becomming liable to give possession away in dangerous situations too often and green coming on was unavoidable....spark/swp came on before derry/hoilett......ever though arry might not want to risk an injury to derry/hoilett before saturdays '6 pointer' with villa????.......i'll wait!!!!!you know nothing john snow!!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by hh9 View PostWe had a lot better players on the bench tha Sunderland
Last nights game was a '6 pointer', the difference would have been 5 points instad of 8 if we had won the match
Comment
-
Originally posted by hh9 View PostGreen for Cesar forced because of groin injury - Green did well
Park for Diakite - wrong - should have been Derry
SWP for Taarabt - wrong - should have been Hoilett for Mackie
Taarabt just has to be on the field - only one to make something happen
It is obvious that HR does not like Taarabt
I guess Taarabt was taken off as a precaution as he got a slight injury. Hoilett should've come instead of SWP.
Mackie was ok.QPR fan since1987
@yousef_qpr
Comment
-
Originally posted by KentHoopNSV View PostThey may have been an element of Arry wanting to see for himself what certain players could do? We may find that SWP just played his last game? (another observation, Anton didnt get a look-in)
Comment
Comment