Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ian Taylor

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Hughes rarely involves himself in training from what I've heard, by all accounts he is fairly detached from the players and doesn't involve himself to much - the main reason he has such an extensive back room of staff.

    Comment


    • #17
      Perhaps I am pregnant and not fat?

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Sminky View Post
        Hughes rarely involves himself in training from what I've heard, by all accounts he is fairly detached from the players and doesn't involve himself to much - the main reason he has such an extensive back room of staff.
        Probably the reason why we are so crap

        Comment


        • #19
          David McIntyre ‏@davidmcintyre76

          just catching up on rumours, tweets etc. Not unusual 4manager not to take training on Mon as its a warm-down session. Worth mentioning. #qpr

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by toplondonclub View Post
            David McIntyre ‏@davidmcintyre76

            just catching up on rumours, tweets etc. Not unusual 4manager not to take training on Mon as its a warm-down session. Worth mentioning. #qpr
            FFS Warm down,when did they heat up then ??

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by scuberry View Post
              FFS Warm down,when did they heat up then ??
              Lol thats exactly what I thought!

              Comment


              • #22
                It's all about STABILITY!

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by QPR Richard View Post
                  Questions now have to be asked about Beard's conduct. If Hughes is staying, why the hell is he interfering in the manager's preparations for a tough game ahead? Hughes could have run the training session and had the meeting after.
                  Think we both know that our shower of shyte would need the next ten years worth of 'preperation', to avoid what is the nearest thing to a 'dead cert' we will ever see in our lives, ManUre winning by at least 3 or 4 clear goals, if not more, on Saturday.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by BUSHRANGER1982 View Post
                    Think we both know that our shower of shyte would need the next ten years worth of 'preperation', to avoid what is the nearest thing to a 'dead cert' we will ever see in our lives, ManUre winning by at least 3 or 4 clear goals, if not more, on Saturday.
                    BUT if there any 'believers' still out there we are 14/1 to beat them Saturday
                    "Steve, do you think 25k is a good option when there are indications that within four years, new stadiums on average have increased attendances of 60%?
                    For us that would mean around 29k."


                    QPR Richard 16-12-2013 10.08pm

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by NW_Hoopz View Post
                      BUT if there any 'believers' still out there we are 14/1 to beat them Saturday
                      Those are shot odds. Ought to be closer to 40-1.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by scuberry View Post
                        FFS Warm down,when did they heat up then ??
                        Did they exert themselves in producing such a disjointed, disinterested & pathetic display against a side that had lost all previous 5 away games and who should have been beaten, even more so with such a dodgy keeper.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by EYR View Post
                          The key word in Taylors tweet is 'tonight'.
                          sorry to be a bit anal on this, but if a comma was used either before or after the word "tonight", this would indicate exactly what he meant - as it stands it is very ambiguous....try it.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by twranger View Post
                            sorry to be a bit anal on this, but if a comma was used either before or after the word "tonight", this would indicate exactly what he meant - as it stands it is very ambiguous....try it.
                            You are of course assuming that he has a good grasp of grammar.

                            We have a manager who isn't managing, coaches who do not appear to be coaching and players who cannot play. Why should the press officer be able to do anything right?

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by brightonr View Post
                              You are of course assuming that he has a good grasp of grammar.

                              We have a manager who isn't managing, coaches who do not appear to be coaching and players who cannot play. Why should the press officer be able to do anything right?

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by brightonr View Post
                                You are of course assuming that he has a good grasp of grammar.

                                We have a manager who isn't managing, coaches who do not appear to be coaching and players who cannot play. Why should the press officer be able to do anything right?
                                So true.....I expect far too much, I know!:drunk:

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X