Originally posted by Cookie Monster
View Post
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hughes has been successful at other clubs. So what has gone wrong at QPR?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by vblockranger View PostAs in we have bought a set of mercurial players on vast wages that have no hunger or desire to do well and do not even respect Hughes enough to give more than 75% per game.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cookie Monster View PostPrecisely. That policy didnt begin hughes though (anton swp) and im not sutre it would end if we got rid of him
Comment
-
Originally posted by vblockranger View PostCesar,Green,Onhua,Bosingwa,Fabio,Hoilett, Diakitte,Mbia,Granero,AJ,Zamora,Cisse,Park...all MH players and make up the bulk of the 11 he puts out. His players,he brought them and he cant get them to perform.
Jury is out on m'bia
More worried about park, bosingwa and Zamora
Comment
-
The point im trying to make that is getting bogged down in the detail.
Is that there are reasons that we are not suceeding that go beyond the manager.
That doesnt mean that Hughes is not guilty of getting things. But that a new manager may not simply solve these problems and lead to instant sucess.
Comment
-
Originally posted by W13 Exile View PostSounds like the players don't want Hughes around otherwise they would roll their sleeves up and put a shift in like last season?"Steve, do you think 25k is a good option when there are indications that within four years, new stadiums on average have increased attendances of 60%?
For us that would mean around 29k."
QPR Richard 16-12-2013 10.08pm
Comment
-
This is it MH fault or the players, my view is it is defo MH.
Just take summer everyone who had any knowledge of QPR knew our weaknesses were as follows following from last seasons miracle escape.
1. Improve the defence (complete overhaul)
2. Get a proper striker or two in
3. Holding midfield player
4. Sort out our discipline issues
Those were our priorities and MH never dealt with any of them instead
1. Defenders brought in at last minute as panic signings
2. Everyone knew AJ was a sick note but MH wanted to build his team round him, as to BZ foolem couldn't of been any happier. At least MH could have got one big signing upfront.
3. Completey ignored and now we don't understand why teams simply run through us
4. Discipline, argument can a manager legislate for players losing it, I say yes if it occurs regularly. He was suppose to bring in high tech backroom staff but we instead get loads of injuries and players lashing out for no reason.
Tactically MH is inept, JB only came off last season against Liverpool because of the fans that's the only good technical substation he has made.
I don't know what tactics we play, it's just school football at times plus MH is directly linked to our transfer policy. HIS,en we're in place to deal with transfers this isn't a case where the chairman was signing players behind the managers back or a football of director at odds with the manager dealing with transfers.Last edited by TBLOCKRANGER; 11-11-2012, 12:04 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pblockranger View PostWhen was Hughes successful?
Had 1 season at Foolham and they finished 8th.
Pretty sucessful IMO.You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.
Comment
-
i wouldnt say he was a successful manager but his track record was a good manager. Never messed up a team he was at prior to coming to us. Even at a top end club like Citeh he held his own. When he signed for us even though I opposed it, i never thought he would be so awful, i just didnt like what he represented the suits, the clinical approach to management, the agents etc but i am amazed had how awful he has been.
The concern is even if he leaves what he will have left behind is so bad, its a hospital path for any successor.
I think we are in a worse position now both position and squad wise than when Warnock left.
Comment
Comment