Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Interesting analysis ......
Collapse
X
-
I think most will agree AT is at his best when allowed to roam, so wouldn't he be better off in the hole behind the striker so we could then keep the shape in the midfield? The only thing is this prob wouldn't give Ale a start but Mackie or SWP
Comment
-
Originally posted by johnp View PostWe shouldn't play Hoilett, Taraabt and Cisse in the same line up. All are loose cannons so we'll never keep any shape.You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.
Comment
-
Originally posted by QPRDave View PostSo thats it then is it??......We might as well hire the bloke that made this vid......It's all too simple to explain it away that easily, I can't believe our management team haven't looked at this, as the bloke says basics.
Comment
-
I would still keep one of these back as an impact sub. we need to start from a solid base. Obviously we lack defenders who are good in the air (apart from Nelsen) - hopefully that will get rectified in January. I think Diakite, Granero & Faurlin should all play, leaving Taraabt, Cisse and Zamora as the front three. I would hold Hoilett back.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MattyRangers View PostAll about opinions mate, but in mine, we should certainly be starting our 3 most creative players. Without Tarbs Cisse & Hoilet I fail to see where any goals would come from? As for "loose cannons" - Cisse is, undoubtedly, but cant really seehow Tarbs or Hoilet can be classed as that at all?
Comment
Comment