Hughes has to stay

[QPR Richard]

Firstly, I don't want to see us sacking our manager, at least not yet, but you have to question some of his bizarre decisions. Can someone please explain why he gave a defensive squad place to a midfielder? What about giving a forward's place to a midfielder? It's all very well saying players are versatile and can play a number of positions, but how many out-and-out strikers do we have? How many genuine left backs do we have? Park and SWP have been two bob yet he plays them every week. Clint Hill and Nedum Onouha can play left back? Do me a favour.

There are big question marks over Hughes and results prove that. If you haven't noticed, we're bottom of the league. Things are not rosy in the garden and, while I'm prepared to give him a bit more time, we have to accept that this is his squad and these are his teams, and crucially, THIS IS HIS DEFENCE. Hughes chose to go with just eight defenders. He chooses to play Hill, Onouha and Fabio at LB. He continues with Ferdinand and/or Onouha, and he keeps our only genuine LB on the bench. These are his choices and it's all been a disaster so far.

I'm prepared to give him time, but not much more.

[rickyranger]

Totally agree. Easy to say keep Hughes and give him time. But those that were there today saw players who looked bored/not interested and most importantly not wanting to play for Hughes. You can give him as much time as you want but those things are not fixable. I was also on the fence regarding Hughes before today. But after seeing that today his time is up. It was abysmal. A terrible performance.

Heard today also that big time unrest in the dressing room. Players want to play a certain way and Hughes is not allowing them. A certain Traore was mentioned as a disruptive influence.

Who looked bored and uninterested, I was there and they were devastated when they didn't get anything at the end. Long way from a terrible performance, yes defending was poor but for large parts of the game we were much the better team. Possible there are some disruptive players, is at every club who always come to the for when things are going badly.

Sure there are some on here who just love a drama, if you know something spell it out clearly not little throw away comments that help nothing.

[qblockoompah]

Funny how rumours of unrest surface soon as things dont go too swimmingly . Total tosh

[W12_Ranger]

Funny how rumours of unrest surface soon as things dont go too swimmingly . Total tosh

Always seem to surface via the same pissheads at HT along the concourses at away games....funny that as well!

[qblockoompah]

Always seem to surface via the same pissheads at HT along the concourses at away games....funny that as well!

Spot on, some away games is like watching Loose Women, middle aged goats having a right old gossip

[Sotonsuperhoop]

There are always disruptive players in any squad and MH has to handle them, problem is its very clear he doesnt get on with Traore and Adel. Adel has shown us what's been missing so hopefully he'll start every game. Park plays cos TFT and Beard wanted the Far East connection for long term growth so he'll always play.

SWP is clearly MH's favourite but unless we drop Park and SWP we will suffer all season

I don't want MH sacked but sooner or later someone upstairs will start to question why our most talented players only sit on the bench

[Busheyboy]

Against Spurs, Reading, West Ham and WBA, we have scored 6 superb goals and conceded 10 shockers (Shorey free kick the exception)
WE CONNOT DEFEND AND HAVE SEVERAL PLAYERS WHO HAVE NO IDEA, BALL WATCHING, NOT MARKING THEIR MEN, OUT OF POSITION, NOT COMFORTABLE WITH THE BALL, ETC, ETC, ETC.
Until MH realises thIs, it doesn't matter how many we score IT WILL NEVER BE ENOUGH
There is no point us talking about who should be on the left midfield, should Park be captaIn, should We play SWP or Hoilett, Cisse?, Adel. It's ALL IRRELEVENT UNTIL WE GET SOME PROPER DEFENDERS
Every club in the league must be looking forward to playing against our defence