he looked tired or lazy and was arguing with Zammo about who should be where, dropping off, helping mid etc. Worrying that no one knows what to do.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Cisse
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by QPR Richard View PostStrikers are taught to defend. Coaches set up 4 v 2 drills and get the strikers defending from the front. They learn to shut down space for defenders so they have to hoof the ball up the pitch and thereby possibly conceding possession.
Of course, lazy strikers don't bother with this
Comment
-
Originally posted by Geng View Postif you say there are 'areas we don't need to defend in', then i take it you dont mind the fact we were overrun 3vs 2 in centre mid?
or do you think a magical 12th man was going to help out there?
I weas making the comparison with Berbatov as I think SAF has got a few things right in his time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jeems View PostCisse is a lazy type of striker, he won't chase down many things but when given consistent service, he will score.
Cisse will score goals and as long as the defence and midfield do their jobs better qpr will win games
Comment
-
Originally posted by silvercue View PostNo. If you read many of the posts I have made since the game you will see that I think the midfield is where we lost the game and MH was too slow to react to us being 4 v 5 and not coping. However, I think that some players are good enough to play even if their work rate at the opponents end of the pitch is not 100% when they don't have the ball. Tarbs for example. Players like SWP only playing because they run around like idiots has won us precisely zero games this season.
I weas making the comparison with Berbatov as I think SAF has got a few things right in his time.
Comment
Comment