First of all, I don't think they had a terrible game, I think the tactics were wrong which meant we didn't see the best of these two - different thing!
I like them both (despite my thread that Taraabt is better than Granero, I still like the guy), but I am not sure if a centre midfield partnership of the two will work. Neither is a very physical player, and we look really weak with them in the middle. When Diakite plays, we have a lot of "muscle" in there, and I feel comfortable. With these two, the back four seems exposed to me.
To be fair to them, they have not played much together, and maybe they will gel, but I am just not sure. This is why I think buying Granero was a mistake for us, not because he is not a good player, but I just cannot see Faurlin and Granero together - there has to be a Derry or Diakite in there.
I like them both (despite my thread that Taraabt is better than Granero, I still like the guy), but I am not sure if a centre midfield partnership of the two will work. Neither is a very physical player, and we look really weak with them in the middle. When Diakite plays, we have a lot of "muscle" in there, and I feel comfortable. With these two, the back four seems exposed to me.
To be fair to them, they have not played much together, and maybe they will gel, but I am just not sure. This is why I think buying Granero was a mistake for us, not because he is not a good player, but I just cannot see Faurlin and Granero together - there has to be a Derry or Diakite in there.
Comment