totally unacceptable, got my doubts whether they had the heart last night, if you wanted to progress surely you would play 2 front men with support from Hoilett. That defence
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
one man upfront at home
Collapse
X
-
For the lone striker to work well, the midfield need to push up and interchange constantly. Attack as a unit, defend as a unit, all about overloading their defence. Too many times, Cisse was up on his own, and the midfield were too slow to catch up.
Comment
-
West Ham at home is normally a win for us:
Last 6 matches
West Ham United 2 1 Queens Park Rangers 06/11/2004
Queens Park Rangers 1 0 West Ham United 16/10/2004
Queens Park Rangers 3 0 West Ham United 27/04/1996
West Ham United 1 0 Queens Park Rangers 25/11/1995
West Ham United 0 0 Queens Park Rangers 03/05/1995
Queens Park Rangers 2 1 West Ham United 04/12/1994
Comment
-
I was at the game against Reading, and there was no way Hoilett was supporting Cisse upfront - Hughes' tactics were awful! To play two workers like Mackie and Park in the same team at home is stupid! We had no pace on the wings and there was no urgency about our play. Park's best position is central because he can't cross a ball to save his life.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wiz View PostWe've got problems our end too.
Hughton's clueless with subs and leaves it far too late imo.
I seriously fear the worse.You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.
Comment
Comment