What has happened to this seems to have gone all quiet i was expecting him to be banned for a few games
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The F A and John Terry
Collapse
X
-
No doubt they will let it go quiet and then effectively brush it under the carpet with a pointelssly small bad of a couple of games.... probably tied in with when he's injured anyway as they wouldn't want to put him out of course, especially as Roy wants him to pay for England.
-
last i read he was waiting for a personal hearing.Soldier: "im on reconnaissance sir.. im looking for our camouflage expert.. have you seen him?"
Lovejoy: "No?!"
Soldier: "GOD DAMNIT THAT GUYS GOOD!"
Please Follow My Twitter
Comment
-
Originally posted by janemelanie View Post
Comment
-
You'd like to think he they'd leave him out of the visit to LR, my monies on him hobbling off in the 89th minute holding his hamstring in the Ukraine game next tuesday. If he plays against us... I cant fricking wait!Last edited by supahoopsaaa; 06-09-2012, 10:20 AM.
Comment
-
Seeing as he has been cleared by a higher authority of racist abuse there is little that they can brush under the carpet. The FA's charge can only be about using insulting words (not racist words) which players do every game. So, if he gets a big penalty he will be able to appeal and will win as he can demonstrate precedence in numerous other incidents of this same offence..
FA can do hardly anything with this.
Comment
-
In a criminal trial it must be proved 'beyond reasonable doubt'.
FA charge Has to be proved 'on the balance of probabilities'.
Terry has been charged by the FA for breaching rule E3 - Use of abusive and insulting words and/or behaviour which included a reference to ethnic origin and/or colour and/or race towards an opponent.
In court it could not be determined what exactly was said so they could not prove it beyond reasonable doubt. The FA has a lower level if 'on the balance of probabilities' they find that Terry broke the rule then I'd expect a lengthy ban.
Terry has admitted using the words and if he maintains it as a sarcastic reply then the FA would need to decide whether that was more probable than him calling AF what he did out of anger.
Comment
-
Originally posted by supahoopsaaa View PostIn a criminal trial it must be proved 'beyond reasonable doubt'.
FA charge Has to be proved 'on the balance of probabilities'.
Terry has been charged by the FA for breaching rule E3 - Use of abusive and insulting words and/or behaviour which included a reference to ethnic origin and/or colour and/or race towards an opponent.
In court it could not be determined what exactly was said so they could not prove it beyond reasonable doubt. The FA has a lower level if 'on the balance of probabilities' they find that Terry broke the rule then I'd expect a lengthy ban.
Terry has admitted using the words and if he maintains it as a sarcastic reply then the FA would need to decide whether that was more probable than him calling AF what he did out of anger.
The FA are snookered.
Comment
Comment