Originally posted by MattyRangers
View Post
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
They have never heard of Queens Park Rangers in Brazil... until now
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by MattyRangers View PostAgree, but we're not though - we have a lower wage bill than last year, a net spend of £1.5mill and are developing the whole infrastructure of the club. We dont have some crazy rich owner strolling in splashing mega dough and using us as his real life game of Football Manager whilst he is bored - although the media would have you believe otherwise.
Comment
-
Originally posted by silvercue View PostMatty, my svelte chap. Yes, I do think it is too much for a reserve keeper. A keeper that thought he was coming in as the number one. It's good to see us building and bringing players in, but this seems a strange one to me.You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.
Comment
-
I think we trust TF because he says the right things, has been decisive regarding NW/MH (though we STILL needed another team to keep us up, so MH didn't do it for us) and he has made positive changes. So we all back him.
However, a big issue in the volitile Middle East, which is never a million miles away could send Oil prices through the roof and cripple airline companies, lose huge amounts in value and make some go out of business. He isn't even that rich compared to some football owners, so we are walking on a tight rope and we should not take things for granted.
People talk about money from "other sources" but until that is made clear I assume that is the TV money. We are far too small to be spending 40k+ a week on a second goalie. It may cause unrest too.
I trust TF, but he hasn't done this before and everyone makes mistakes.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MattyRangers View PostAgree, but we're not though - we have a lower wage bill than last year, a net spend of £1.5mill and are developing the whole infrastructure of the club. We dont have some crazy rich owner strolling in splashing mega dough and using us as his real life game of Football Manager whilst he is bored - although the media would have you believe otherwise.
Also, Green deal was agreed before Kenny handed in his transfer request for Leeds. Previously Hughes had wanted Kenny as competition for Green, after he left he had to get another keeper in. Cerny is a good keeper, but is not competition.
Comment
-
At the moment Rob Green is first choice. He will be first choice even if he makes error after errror. He has no competition. Its easy to say Cerny but the guy clearly has injuries that Hughes can see day in and day out. Murphy will never start ahead of Green.
So getting this guy in means competition and will force Green to work harder than ever to start. If he gets a chance to play he knows he has to take it. Competition for places is never a bad thing and at the moment Green has no competition.
The priority for me is watching the best 11 players on the pitch for QPR. Let the accountants worry about whatever people get paid.
Comment
-
Originally posted by silvercue View PostI think we trust TF because he says the right things, has been decisive regarding NW/MH (though we STILL needed another team to keep us up, so MH didn't do it for us) and he has made positive changes. So we all back him.
However, a big issue in the volitile Middle East, which is never a million miles away could send Oil prices through the roof and cripple airline companies, lose huge amounts in value and make some go out of business. He isn't even that rich compared to some football owners, so we are walking on a tight rope and we should not take things for granted.
People talk about money from "other sources" but until that is made clear I assume that is the TV money. We are far too small to be spending 40k+ a week on a second goalie. It may cause unrest too.
I trust TF, but he hasn't done this before and everyone makes mistakes.
Our TV revenues will be enormous- £60million+, as well as the amount of new revenues we're bringing in from the far east, new sponsors and commercial deals. I'm confident we have the money to meet our expenditure.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DouDou_87 View PostThe success or failure of Air Asia will have absolutely no impact on us, other than the fact we might not have the QPR jet to cruise round in as much.
Our TV revenues will be enormous- £60million+, as well as the amount of new revenues we're bringing in from the far east, new sponsors and commercial deals. I'm confident we have the money to meet our expenditure.
As for the whole Park myth - no one outside of SK is interested in him and 95% of merchandising in Asia is fake - so let's wait and see what we make from shirt deals sales in profit from SK. It will be minor.
I am happy we have competition for places, but without seeing some evidence I think 40k a week is too much for a club our size to spend on a 2nd keeper - and bigger clubs than us wouldn't do it.
Also - lets get things into context and look at the rest of our squad. We could spend that money far better elsewhere.
Our TV revenue is no bigger than other clubs.
Comment
-
Originally posted by silvercue View PostAnd what new revenues are you talking about? We are not allowed to sell any TV rights abroad or internet rights. We get no new revenues for being shown more times in Asia than any other club as that is not how the TV deal is set up overseas (and how it differs from the home deal). Sponsorship - how many new sponsers are we brininging in and what are they sponsoring?
As for the whole Park myth - no one outside of SK is interested in him and 95% of merchandising in Asia is fake - so let's wait and see what we make from shirt deals sales in profit from SK. It will be minor.
I am happy we have competition for places, but without seeing some evidence I think 40k a week is too much for a club our size to spend on a 2nd keeper - and bigger clubs than us wouldn't do it.
Also - lets get things into context and look at the rest of our squad. We could spend that money far better elsewhere.
Our TV revenue is no bigger than other clubs.
Bear in mind that JSP is a big name around Asia, not just Korea. Also that we have a chinese company sponsoring our training kit.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jeems View PostBear in mind that JSP is a big name around Asia, not just Korea. Also that we have a chinese company sponsoring our training kit.
Comment
-
Originally posted by silvercue View PostAnd what new revenues are you talking about? We are not allowed to sell any TV rights abroad or internet rights. We get no new revenues for being shown more times in Asia than any other club as that is not how the TV deal is set up overseas (and how it differs from the home deal). Sponsorship - how many new sponsers are we brininging in and what are they sponsoring?
As for the whole Park myth - no one outside of SK is interested in him and 95% of merchandising in Asia is fake - so let's wait and see what we make from shirt deals sales in profit from SK. It will be minor.
I am happy we have competition for places, but without seeing some evidence I think 40k a week is too much for a club our size to spend on a 2nd keeper - and bigger clubs than us wouldn't do it.
Also - lets get things into context and look at the rest of our squad. We could spend that money far better elsewhere.
Our TV revenue is no bigger than other clubs.
2) You're right- matches shown overseas do not bring in any new direct revenues. What they do is build interest in the club, grow the fan base and develop the brand- after our tour of Asia there was something like 16,000 new memberships from South Korea, Indonesia and Malaysia alone. So other than the membership fee, we will also get money from 3rd parties who will market to these new members. Plus we will be able to sell official merchandise to them.
3) Park wasn't brought in to sell shirts- he was brought in to raise our profile in one of the biggest emerging markets in football. We'll make money from him for the same reasons as above and also because he will attract big sponsors to our club from SK. From what I've seen of him so far, he also looks like one of the best players I've seen at Loftus Road for years and years, which is a nice added bonus.
4) Our TV revenue is no bigger than other clubs- correct, BUT OUR WAGE BILL IS SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER. It is lower than it was at this time last year. The Premiership TV deal guarantees £60mil per season as well as an extra payment depending on final league standing. So after this season we would have made about £120mil JUST FROM TV RIGHTS.
5) Philip Beard- renowned as one of the most commercially aware blokes in the business- trust me, he will see opportunities to bring in extra cash all the place.
6) 40k a week is a lot for a number 2 keeper, but when the opportunity to sign someone of Julio Caesar's quality comes up, you have to take it
Overall, I think we're in a pretty good place financially. Incredibly rich shareholders, a proven businessman at the top and a sound commercial team behind him. Personally, I think it's great that we have the current England number 2 and the former Brazil number 1 competing for starting places, whereas previously it was Frasier Digby and Nikki Bull. But then maybe that's just me.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MattyRangers View PostI can see that point, ie paying such big wages for a reserve keeper, but I just tend to put my faith in TF and think hes a sucessful business man for a reason and if he wasnt comfortablr with it, he wouldnt let the Cesar signing happen.
Me too and Im really hoping everything in the garden stays rosey
BUT
New Labour thought they'd cured boom n bust and we all also thought we'd be able to carry on getting a free hand full of pick n mix from Woolworths
So what I'm trying to say is you never know who's waiting to jump out and kick ya in the Bollicks if ya know what i mean
Let the good times roll on for as long as I'm around"Steve, do you think 25k is a good option when there are indications that within four years, new stadiums on average have increased attendances of 60%?
For us that would mean around 29k."
QPR Richard 16-12-2013 10.08pm
Comment
-
Comment