If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
having being to both games so far I must say I dont think MH has any idea on how to get his best 11 and a system that suits either. 3 of Swansea's last 4 goals came by them running 30-40 yds unchallenged and picking out an unmarked player for a 1 on 1 with Green. We have a new keeper and a defence that needs improving hence bids for Samba in January and Dawson now. Our team last week and yesterday looked very unbalanced and unfortunately the blame for that lies we the man who picks the team.
but by claiming our owners are all mouth and no trousers makes you sound like a spoilt ignorant child.
I would assume ALL owners were precisely that unless there was a clear demonstration to the contrary, and so far we have had rather a lot of mouthing off re our ambitions, whereas our trousers were round our ankles when we played Swansea. How is that observation spoiled, ignorant or childish? I may disagree with you but I don't insult you.
What really upsets me is that we're very poor right now on the park, have been for some time, and I haven't seen much improvement under Hughes. Has anyone?
I doubt if harry would even come to qpr,but i also doubt if the chairman will get rid of mark hughes
so where will harry go,I think back to spurs probably or maybe west ham
With you Ted I don’t think we can get rid of Hughes even if we wanted too as the whole set up is based around his people; if he goes they do too and we have to start again
Arsenal well Wenger is going no where plus fans would not have Harry
Spurs they have not flown out the blocks but would Levy go back I don’t think so
Chelsea although they appeared to want anyone but Di Matteo he and they have made a great start to the season and if they did dump Roberto (in a year) Pepe will walk in
Fulham have had a decent start but has the Dempsey situation unsettled things behind the scenes???
Then their is West Ham but their owners don’t have a rep of sacking managers
At the end of that I m non the wiser, my hunch would be Fulham/West Ham if there is truth in this
Would make WHU favs wouldn't rule out Arsenal the love affair with Wenger looks to be wearing thin then murmerings of us
I think Fulham playing tidy football and look comfortable mid table at the moment ,Spurs no .The residents of Fulham broadway no
I would assume ALL owners were precisely that unless there was a clear demonstration to the contrary, and so far we have had rather a lot of mouthing off re our ambitions, whereas our trousers were round our ankles when we played Swansea. How is that observation spoiled, ignorant or childish? I may disagree with you but I don't insult you.
What really upsets me is that we're very poor right now on the park, have been for some time, and I haven't seen much improvement under Hughes. Has anyone?
Fair point apologies for that comment, although I did say it made you sound like that rather than you are, but as I say apologies.To me all mouth and no trousers suggests TF and the board have said they will back MH and then not done so, and that is not true.
Comment