Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Raheem Sterling loan bid?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    bump

    Comment


    • #17
      No!! we don't need another midfielder first, and second he had his chance, and after us giving him a platform to show what he can do he decided we weren't good enough. Hope this is just usual made up ****. All we'd be doing is helping Liverpool. I think it's a laughable idea after the meagre amount we received for him from Liverpool, now they want us/somebody to do more work to get him up to the level they require.

      Comment


      • #18
        Anyone remember tony saying we won't be loaning any more players as we do not want to bringing up a opposition team member .

        Comment


        • #19
          We have to look after our own youngsters like this lad, who's just signed an extension, not Liverpools

          Comment


          • #20
            He left for bigger and better things,greedy little b astard ,leave him up there I say.
            Ooh northern lads love gravy

            Comment


            • #21
              He left to go and play for a bigger side and the team he supports.

              There are valid reasons for not taking him, many already given in this thread.

              Him being greedy is not one of them.

              Comment


              • #22
                Team he supports yeah right,its all about the money
                Ooh northern lads love gravy

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by QPRDave View Post
                  We have to look after our own youngsters like this lad, who's just signed an extension, not Liverpools
                  http://www.qpr.co.uk/page/NewsDetail...857720,00.html
                  why was he not taken on the Malaysia tour like Harriman, Doughty, Ehmer etc? seems strange if they rate em? no Balanta either?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    He took the money. He can phook orf.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by vanhoop View Post
                      Team he supports yeah right,its all about the money
                      So we laud players like Birch and Gallen for playing for the team they support, but snort at other players who may do the same?

                      I'm sure their far superior youth set up had something to do with it too.

                      The bitterness on here because a player has, for whatever reason chosen another club over us is silly tbh.

                      We cannot expect players to feel the same way about the club as we do...

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by DeepcutHoop View Post
                        So we laud players like Birch and Gallen for playing for the team they support, but snort at other players who may do the same?

                        I'm sure their far superior youth set up had something to do with it too.

                        The bitterness on here because a player has, for whatever reason chosen another club over us is silly tbh.

                        We cannot expect players to feel the same way about the club as we do...
                        It's not the same as choosing another club over us is it? He was with our club to start with and thanked us by walking away first chance he got.Well we are a different club now, and we don't need to nursemaid other teams youngsters for them, if he ain't good enough for Liverpool yet then he ain't good enough for us
                        Last edited by QPRDave; 26-07-2012, 09:30 AM.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by DeepcutHoop View Post
                          So we laud players like Birch and Gallen for playing for the team they support, but snort at other players who may do the same?

                          I'm sure their far superior youth set up had something to do with it too.

                          The bitterness on here because a player has, for whatever reason chosen another club over us is silly tbh.

                          We cannot expect players to feel the same way about the club as we do...
                          You seem a fairly well spoken articulate chap.

                          However I suggest you read through your posts before you send them.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            I would imagine that if Raheem Sterling was 10 years younger and was with us now, as we move towards having our own academy, he would stay. As it was I can understand him moving on. At his age money wouldn't have played much of a part, he's probably on no more than £3k a week right now.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Rich View Post
                              I would imagine that if Raheem Sterling was 10 years younger and was with us now, as we move towards having our own academy, he would stay. As it was I can understand him moving on. At his age money wouldn't have played much of a part, he's probably on no more than £3k a week right now.
                              This is very relevant.

                              We were trying to keep him with promises of throwing him into the first team, when he was only 15, when Liverpool could offer a professional, well-funded youth system (and probably a little bit more money, although we don't actually know who was offering more money)

                              The new setup would probably have given him more pause, but Liverpool are still probably better equipped to develop youth talent, for now.

                              You also wonder quite how much the decision was with the 15 year old Sterling, and how much with his parents?

                              I think it would be worth taking him on loan, for the reasons I stated earlier in the thread, but also at least we'd get something out of the time and effort we put into his development (beyond the compensation we have/will receive)

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                If we can buy him after a season on loan then I would say yes.
                                QPR
                                Best team in the world
                                Sort of

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X