how can you make statistical statements based on such a small sample of the games played. It can take one big mistake in a single game to change things a lot.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
anyone seen this from arsenal ...outrageous crap
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by NortholtRanger097 View PostCouldnt be arsed to read half of that as it looks like a load of shite , if the editor of the article wants to sign up to here and explain some of the woeful decisions that went against us then feel free
Comment
-
anyone seen this from arsenal ...outrageous crap
its complicated but basically says the refs were on our side last season..
Comment
-
summary
It is likely that the biased positive wrong decisions in the games we reviewed have helped QPR to win some extra points.
And then the only question that needs an answer is: why?
And then we enter difficult grounds. Has it anything to do with the sponsor? I really, really hope that this is not the case. But the fact that the PGMOL and QPR have the same company as a sponsor leaves a somewhat sour taste in mouth.
I can only suggest the PGMOL should make an end to this sponsorship relation with this company. In the lights of these numbers some things could be suggested. The PGMOL has to act to prevent such things to be suggested. And I don’t mean that they should shut us up, no they should make sure that whoever sponsors them, they have no connections with any other club in the PL.
Comment
-
in a word BOOLOX!!!! ive read some boring crap on message boards but that takes the prize for the most boring drivel ive ever read! sorry but its gonna have to be DOUBLE BOOLOX!LONDON CALLING TO THE ZOMBIES OF DEATH.... ALSO KNOW AS BRENTFORD FANS
Comment
-
Originally posted by maverick69 View PostSurely fundamentally flawed.
I could go to town on that.........
But to start with he has taken qualitative/subjective data and turned it in to quantitative/objective with no mention of an effective research methodolgy.
Sure you can make a database of feedback - but what were the philisophical assumptions? What of the axiology, epistamology and/or ontology? Does the fact that it's an Arsenal site mean skewed results?
Comment
Comment