Tweet
Why wouldn't it be.
-
-
Would anyone want to loan Barton and not play him, but let him train with their team and possibly injure one of their players.
Not the best idea I've ever heard.
And if we're giving a fee to a team to get him out of a ban, I'd suspect both clubs would indeed be in hot water with the FA.Comment
-
-
We done it with Clint Hill to Forest season just gone so yes. Just means we then have a squad of 24Originally posted by NortholtRanger097 View PostComment
-
Yep, or some Championship kid wants to make a name for himself and crocks him in training, leaving him unplayable and unsellable. Just too many things can go wrong.Originally posted by Stanley76 View Post
Joey has a huge target on his back, maybe just leaving him out for half a season would be good if we're going to keep him. And make sure he stays out the spotlight, no tweets, he just gets his head down and grafts a bit. He needs to let his feet do the talking for once.Comment
-
US pay THEM a fee to send him to them on loan?!Originally posted by QPRDave
Comment
-
Stop answering that stanley i deleted that post,Originally posted by Stanley76 View PostUS pay THEM a fee to send him to them on loan?! 
as will had an answer before i asked the question.
BTW if it was the difference between paying a loan fee or stumping up £11mill it would be a cheap option imo
Comment
-
Ah sorry Dave, just seen you deleted it.Originally posted by QPRDave View PostStop answering that stanley i deleted that post, as will had an answer before i asked the question.
BTW if it was the difference between paying a loan fee or stumping up £11mill it would be a cheap option imo Anyway I can't imagine that not breaching some kind of FA rule.
Comment
-
yeah agree mateOriginally posted by Stanley76 View PostAh sorry Dave, just seen you deleted it. Anyway I can't imagine that not breaching some kind of FA rule.Comment
Comment