If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Even if Warnock had kept us up, would he have been able to build upon that? Would Mike Rigg have signed on? Would we have landed the likes of Diakite, Taiwo and Cisse? I'm not so sure and although he'll have my eternal respect and gratitude I wish he'd stop talking about us to the press.
not sure Warnock would have found the quality players huges did to keep us up Diakite Taiwo Onouha. Also dont think Cisse and Zamora would have come under Warnock and Taarabt was better under Hughes also as a previous poster was correct our late home form kept us up
If I were sacked and my successor had performed as his successor had I would feel justified in doing what he has done; it wasn't abusive, it was simply a reminder that his results stack up quite favourably in comparison to MH's, and if he leaves it at that I can't fault him.
A lot of the press coverage (and fans views too!) centred on the assertion that he was clueless as far as the PL was concerned but his results give the lie to that. MH has done no better on average.
The reason TF sacked him was more to do with long term aspirations for the club and on that point his removal was justified, but not purely on results while he was in charge. Respect Neil....
At least he picked the right club to beat at home, but a few more home wins in autumn and he would probably still have been here.
I am the biggest fan of Warnock for what he has done, forever a legend, but in hinsight I agree that we probably needed a bigger name manager to attract bigger name players.
Like Warnock and like Hughes... and like Fernandez
i believe warnock may of kept us up.. but we wouldnt be attracting the better quality players we are now.
Can't see that myself. Our home form at the end, an amazing 15 points from 15 in tough games is what kept us up just.... NW couldn't win at home and only a very very lucky win against Chelsea with 9 men ffs was his only victory. If he'd been in charge i think we'd have got a max of 6 points from those 5 home games and gone down by some margin.
My point is you can take any set of results in isolation to support your cause, but the fact is there are 38 games in the season and Hughes had a better points per game record than Warnock.
If Warnock had continued to average 0.85 points a game for the rest of the season we'd have finished on 32 points.
Comment