now im about to be slapped in the face with a wet hallibut by some here......................i would pick swp in the starting line up on sunday at citeh...........and i'll tell you why..............the odds are we will lose this game reguardless of what you hope for.however if hughes picks a side on the basis of a damage limitation excercise n we go down with a wimper i will hold that against him forever more....i think swp 'owes' us one big performance .....against his old club with a point to prove....we will only conter attack and pace on the break will be paramount in any success we might get.....therefore swp and cisse 'must' start ahead of zamora and buzz................i await my wet face!
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
facto's controversial thoughts
Collapse
X
-
Problem is we will be too weak on corners and set pieces which Zamora is also very good at. Tough one, but if fit i would stay with Zamora and hope he can turn in a performance and bully there back 4 for us.
I would go and say that if i had a choice of Buzz (who i like) or SWP then at the moment SWP would win as Buzz keeps giving the ball away to easy at the moment and we ca not afford to do.One for all.... and all for one
Comment
-
Originally posted by QuarterPoundeR View PostGood call Facto. Mackie always gives us 100%, but what he gives is poor. SWP to start and Mackie to come on as sub if required. Hope you aren't disappointed not to be slapped with something wet and smelling of fishyou know nothing john snow!!!!
Comment
-
I have to say Im inclined to agree Facto me ol' mucker.
Mackie has been superb this year, but I wouldnt mind seeing SWP given a run out against his old club (players always seem to raise their game against old clubs). He looked sharp when he came on, he will have a point to prove.
As you say, we are more than likely going to lose anyway.You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.
Comment
-
trouble is with SWP we will be tempted to lump it long top take advantage of his power in the air.
Comment
Comment