Tarrabt Behind The Front man or as Striker?

[qblockpete]

your views>

[Morris]

In the Rooney role, behind the main striker where hes hard to pick up.

[THE FLYING COW]

no i disagree scrap the one man up front play him as another striker re launch the two man attack.............lets bring back attacking football to loftus road

[qprjim]

In the Rooney role, behind the main striker where hes hard to pick up.

Agree this is where he will be most effective with his skills and vision creating space and oppourtunities for himself and others

[NewCrossHoop]

Quite like the way him and Hogan have been linking up with the spurs lad on the left and Hogan in the middle.

Depends if Cook is fit and picked i suppose

[Power40]

With the shortage of strikers at the moment he should play him upfront

But in a perfect world i'd have him on the left and routeledge on the right

[EYR]

Just play the team the beat Bristol City.

[Underwood15]

Tarrabt is more dangerous running at players, playing him upfront would mean he would have his back to goal most of the time.

[Bluehoop]

I think it depends on who the striker is - with our current limited options I would push him in behind to provide a second line of attack.

[qblockpete]

Blackstock has gone.

helgusson hasn't trained all week, could be out for season.

That leaves De carmine

[Bluehoop]

Blackstock has gone.

helgusson hasn't trained all week, could be out for season.

That leaves De carmine

I thought the question was more general than for the rest of this season - (on the basis he may be here next year) but with SDC as the only option (no place for Balanta/German?) I would still play him "in the hole" - to pick up the supply that passes SDC by as he picks himself up off the floor.

[baz]

2nd striker in the hole

[EYR]

Play Agyemang in the hole..................

[Bluehoop]

Play Agyemang in the hole..................

LOFL

[crowlehoops]

Di Carmine on his own up front:cry: