Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Spurs vs Chelsea

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    i ****iing hate chelsea, they are bunch of dirty cheating *****

    Comment


    • #47
      right - so Mikel does what Becks did in 98...he got a yellow...which means that it's "been dealt with by the ref at the time so we canot use video evidence"...Atkinson...another winning decision...

      Comment


      • #48
        Awful refereeing decision. Unsure of how Spurs will respond to that against us, they'll either carry it on or give a real response :/
        We're Queens Park Rangers and we always do things the hard way!
        @Deadend_Friend

        Comment


        • #49
          Agree with previous comments if Spurs were going to loose so we could take advantage this was the way. They will be totally flat

          Comment


          • #50
            Also why was I not surprised to hear Chelsea fans singing during minutes silence

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by West Acton View Post
              Also why was I not surprised to hear Chelsea fans singing during minutes silence
              Not being English they probably didn't understand the announcer, either that or they're just a bunch of *****, i would say more the latter.
              Queens Park Rangers
              NPower Champions 2010/2011

              PREMIER LEAGUE 2011 - ETERNITY (Oh well got that wrong, we'll be back though)

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by QPR_NW10 View Post
                right - so Mikel does what Becks did in 98...he got a yellow...which means that it's "been dealt with by the ref at the time so we canot use video evidence"...Atkinson...another winning decision...
                I don't think he actually saw it. If you watch closely Parker says to Atkinson that he was stamped on. That puts doubt into the ref's mind and he feels he has to do something so stays safe and gives a yellow and now it's been dealt with there is nothing that can be done retrospectively.

                The refs at this level are really bad.

                And it's laughable that this was the ref who couldn't see Hill's goal up at Bolton.
                First game: Arsenal vs Queen's Park Rangers at Highbury, Saturday 17th November 1984.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by HammersmithR View Post
                  I don't think he actually saw it. If you watch closely Parker says to Atkinson that he was stamped on. That puts doubt into the ref's mind and he feels he has to do something so stays safe and gives a yellow and now it's been dealt with there is nothing that can be done retrospectively.

                  The refs at this level are really bad.

                  And it's laughable that this was the ref who couldn't see Hill's goal up at Bolton.
                  But has it been dealt with??? if the ref says he gave the yellow for the handbags and that he never saw the kick then surely that means the FA can charge him retrospectively

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by West Acton View Post
                    But has it been dealt with??? if the ref says he gave the yellow for the handbags and that he never saw the kick then surely that means the FA can charge him retrospectively
                    it's just a mess at the moment. actually just said to my mate that i don't know what i'm more pissed off with this weekend - the ref decisions or the qpr defeat....!

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      I think Mikel was given a yellow for the stamp. To be honest he's a sh1t player so would rather him play us!
                      First game: Arsenal vs Queen's Park Rangers at Highbury, Saturday 17th November 1984.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X