Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Our New 'Width' formation

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    We don't need players to cross the ball as we don't get anyone in there to head the ball. From what I saw last night the crosses from Ramage and Vignal were ok but to the back post when we only had one player on the front post. Our better option is to hit the line and cut back for a tap in. Last night, late on, Routledge got to the line on the left and span and cut back a superb ball that evaded everyone, for me that is the much better option with the close skill and speed we have.
    RIP: Doug, Sniffer and Pat

    Comment


    • #17
      WeAreQPR12 - If you had a back FOUR which lined up like this, why would the term wingbacks or overlap come into play ?

      Hall/Stewart ? - Gorrks - Connolley
      ------ legsofwood or Mahon -------

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by paulmason View Post
        W12_Ranger - What is your point
        No point mate

        Comment


        • #19
          Paul your right it wouldn't happen.
          We don't have players capiable of playing the wing back roll.
          I think dexter wanted Hogan to play it but I think he would have an issue defending.
          Wing backs need to be super fit getting up and down all the time.
          I played sunday league football today.

          Clearly I was the best player on the pitch.

          I scored 5 and made 7 last ditch tackles.

          We lost 5-0 but the rest of my team were sh it!

          Comment

          Working...
          X