If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Jesus,last week i was one of the only people to stick up for Mackie when others were calling him a headless chicken and just runs and never looks up,well yet again today it shows if you have a bit of energy and you run at defences things can happen......oh yeah and at least he tries to make things happen unlike some others
Jesus,last week i was one of the only people to stick up for Mackie when others were calling him a headless chicken and just runs and never looks up,well yet again today it shows if you have a bit of energy and you run at defences things can happen......oh yeah and at least he tries to make things happen unlike some others
Christ, you change like the wind. There are, in reality, only a few of us who stick to supporting the boys in hoops, no matter who they are. The rest of you just pick a fave and a boo boy and go with the flow.
Oh look, only 4 replies because the expert's can't really argue. he is as good as we have but the headless chicken brigade know it all LOFL
I have no doubt he's a headless f***ing chicken! But by today's performance he deserves a go up top with Zammo.
Far too wasteful when he's played on the wing. We will defo go 442 against Fulham and he will be the 2nd striker.
I have no doubt he's a headless f***ing chicken! But by today's performance he deserves a go up top with Zammo.
Far too wasteful when he's played on the wing. We will defo go 442 against Fulham and he will be the 2nd striker.
Without his energy he would never over run the ball or make the wrong choice - you call it headless chicken if you like but I'd have 11 of him over the real headless chickens of this world - SWP, Walcott & Co
Without his energy he would never over run the ball or make the wrong choice - you call it headless chicken if you like but I'd have 11 of him over the real headless chickens of this world - SWP, Walcott & Co
You'd have Mackie over Walcott? Really? Some of our fans really are deluded. Walcott is an England international and at a top 4 club, Mackie has the technical ability of a turnip. Great goal today, but one good game doesn't make you a world beater.
You'd have Mackie over Walcott? Really? Some of our fans really are deluded. Walcott is an England international and at a top 4 club, Mackie has the technical ability of a turnip. Great goal today, but one good game doesn't make you a world beater.
Without his energy he would never over run the ball or make the wrong choice - you call it headless chicken if you like but I'd have 11 of him over the real headless chickens of this world - SWP, Walcott & Co
Your 1st statement makes no sense? SWP and Walcott are also headless chickens but I don't give a flying f**k what anyone says I wouldn't pick Mackie ahead of them. But I would give him a chance up front because the boy has bundles of energy. For the record I love him to bits but he ain't prem quality.
Oh yes - Walcott is an England International - let's all bow down to him. Just like SWP - they really are the dogs nuts aren't they.
Just remind me, when was the last time England won anything
Comment