Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

My starting XI against Blackburn

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Mackie at RB is a good call

    Comment


    • #47
      Yep, totally agree with what others have said about Mackie at right back.

      Leaves Onuaha and Ferdinand to resume their Centre Back partnership.

      I for one would rather have Mackie in the back four than both Hall and Gabbidon! Makes us more solid.


      Come on You Rr's!!!

      Comment


      • #48
        I can see the arguement for having Mackie at RB; but IMO, he would get roasted by Hoillet. Mackie isnt a defender and, for all his effort and energy he would give us, we need a defender with proper defensive capabilities to contain Hoilett, hes a very useful player.
        You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.

        Comment


        • #49
          For what its worth id go with:
          1 KENNY
          2 ONOURA RB
          3 TAIWO LB
          4 HALL CB
          5 FERDINAND CB
          6 BARTON CM
          7 BUZZ CM
          8 MACKIE RM
          9 TRAORE LM
          10 ADEL
          11 ZAMORA

          SWP can cut the oranges if he wants to be involved

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by paulmason View Post
            Why in gods earth would Mark Hughes play a striker come winger at right back or a left back in that position, when he has a perfectly good right back in Onuaha and suitable cover at CB in Hill, Hall and Gabidon.

            Comment


            • #51
              thinking again..

              id rather go for:

              kenny

              onouha - hill - ferdinand - taiwo

              taarabt - barton - buz/derry - traore

              zamora - helguson
              Soldier: "im on reconnaissance sir.. im looking for our camouflage expert.. have you seen him?"
              Lovejoy: "No?!"
              Soldier: "GOD DAMNIT THAT GUYS GOOD!"

              Please Follow My Twitter

              Comment


              • #52
                --------------kenny--------
                Onuaha---Ferdinand---Gabbidon---Hill
                SWP------Barton----Buz-----Traore
                --------------Adel-----------------
                -------------Bobby----------------

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by swede View Post
                  IMO, Playing Hall, Hill or Gabidon at CB would be a better option than playing Mackie at right back, you may not agree, but that's s fine with me.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    This will be the team -

                    Kenny

                    Onouha Ferdinand Gabbidon Taiwo

                    SWP Barton Buszaky Traore

                    Taarabt

                    Zamora

                    If Gabbidon doen't make it through his fitness test Hall will start
                    22nd February away v Charlton is the 40th Anniversary of my support of QPR and my first game. Away v Chelsea 3-3 23rd Feb 1974. 40 years of pure magic!!

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Huge Game and one we must not lose. Granted Mackie was a useful RB in a few championship games. But to put him at RB having not played there all season against a Prem Player like Hoilett is madness! He will get torn a new one. Onuha is a RB. Hall and Gabidon can do a job with Ferdinand.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by paulmason View Post
                        IMO, Playing Hall, Hill or Gabidon at CB would be a better option than playing Mackie at right back, you may not agree, but that's s fine with me.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by paulmason View Post
                          IMO, Playing Hall, Hill or Gabidon at CB would be a better option than playing Mackie at right back, you may not agree, but that's s fine with me.
                          I would watch your back.....That extra s is actually the signal for a sniper

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by SammyKojoe View Post
                            I would watch your back.....That extra s is actually the signal for a sniper
                            I`m a viking.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by swede View Post
                              I`m a viking.
                              A viking? Funny name for a phallus
                              You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by MattyRangers View Post
                                A viking? Funny name for a phallus
                                Got my eyes on you boy. Beware the longboats....and those XL menus.

                                Comment

                                Working...