Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Would Warnock have done worse?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    The reason i asked was not to have go at Hughes, but because all the things that Warnock got blamed for, ie,playing Mackie, SWP on the left, Huges continued to do, yet no ranting on here about him being a clueless ****.
    Our super duper twa**er, sorry tweeter of a skipper mouthing off about now we have plans for each game, f*cking laughable, pointless having plans when the **** can't even find a team mate with a 3yrd pass.
    Just think some players need and should shoulder more of the responsibility, they didn't perform under Warnock and they ain't doing alot better at the mo either.
    Oh and some players are not good enough we know that, he knew that and MH knows that, which is why we went into the market again.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Gtleighsr3 View Post
      Who cares what teethy would do,he aint here now thank ****.Hes busy diggin his tractor out.
      looking for his eyebrows....

      Comment


      • #33
        OK since we seem to want to continue with a "what if" post, I think MH should have taken over at the end of last season/beginning of the season. He possibly would have brought in some of the players he got in January and he might not have brought in the all the players who were brought in the Summer. When he went to Fulham, for the first half of the season they did poorly but then the second half they were much better and finished, I believe, in the top half of the table.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by QPRDave View Post
          So you think Barton's sending off was correct then?
          OK what if you answer this question I asked you last night!

          Comment

          Working...
          X