which one would you pick?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
New stadium or a safe standing stand?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Ablockhoop View PostTo be honest i would of thought safe standing would have more than 50%.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 3touch View PostSo did I, but it still shows that people are unconvinced about a move as the reality of how many fans we actually have. A new ground looks to me to be a gamble that could ruin us.I must away now, I can no longer tarry
This morning's tempest I have to cross
I must be guided without a stumble
Into the arms I love the most
Comment
-
why not have both..the rail seat system,as used in Germany,is best..but having this at an already cramped LR is not the long term solution...
.Villa are being allowed to trial this,and the SPL have been given the green light..so i think it may only be a matter of time before all english clubs are allowed a small section of safe standing areas
Last edited by blueboy; 28-01-2012, 10:32 AM.
Comment
-
I would go with a dedicated safe standing area first as the cost to implement is negligible by comparison, get the crowds up, get the atmosphere up and this would be a way to offer cheaper tickets which many crave.
Then after a few years if decent crowds and a sustained team in the prem, focus on the big investment to relocate if deemed necessary.
Comment
Comment