Our bids have been £5m, then £6.5m both widely reported.
Now £7.5m, which leaves a final bid of £8m to match the initial suggestions of his worth.
Of course, Spurs are still favoutires as they can match anything we offer and are considerably more attractive due to being at the better end of the table and in Europe. Of course, Man City's alleged interest makes us (and Spurs) even less likely, not to mention PSG in his homeland.
Which is a shame as I rate him much better than Cahill.
Anyone who witnessed his outstanding performance at both ends at LR this season, will vouch.
Whereas Cahill, apart from 1 sweet strike at the shrine on Day 1 this season, has been very poor for Bolton (most goals conceeded in Prem) or England and not justified his August price (when he should have walked).
That and being almost out of contract, means Chelski have overpaid IMO, but Samba would be a better acquisition, as I say IMO only.
Now £7.5m, which leaves a final bid of £8m to match the initial suggestions of his worth.
Of course, Spurs are still favoutires as they can match anything we offer and are considerably more attractive due to being at the better end of the table and in Europe. Of course, Man City's alleged interest makes us (and Spurs) even less likely, not to mention PSG in his homeland.
Which is a shame as I rate him much better than Cahill.
Anyone who witnessed his outstanding performance at both ends at LR this season, will vouch.
Whereas Cahill, apart from 1 sweet strike at the shrine on Day 1 this season, has been very poor for Bolton (most goals conceeded in Prem) or England and not justified his August price (when he should have walked).
That and being almost out of contract, means Chelski have overpaid IMO, but Samba would be a better acquisition, as I say IMO only.
Comment