Originally posted by Mellowhoop
View Post
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why do we need so many more players than Swansea and Norwich?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by silvercue View PostWe are in trouble, no doubt. But most on here think we need more players, some say another 6!
We have brought in some quality (on paper) in SWP, JB etc. And we already seemed to think we had better squads than Swansea and Norwich.
So how come we still need a bucket load of players when they are doing fine?
Is it that their style is better suited to the Prem, or do their players look more comfortable?
I can't simply have it is a teamwork/balance thing - otherwise MH should be able to do something similar without another shed load of players.
For the record I think we need more players too....I just don't understand why they are so far ahead of us and not just in terms of points, but performances.
Unrest in the dressingroom when the new players were bought in.(salaries+personality clashes)
1)Players played out of position(Swp especially)
2)Players injuried. (DJ Campbell, Anton injured and in clinch with John Terry,,Hall,Kenny etc...)
3)No system in the backfour due to injuries)
4)Problems backstage/in the staff alledgedly.
5) Warnock/staff was not good enough when it came to make us play as a unit. As a result of that; Lack of composure in the set up during matches.
6) Lack of speed in midfield when we finished an attack. the strikers were not good enough to act first defenders. Poor finishing due to a lack of players in the box.
Phew.
That´s how I have seen it from the telly anyway.:pleasantsuprise:QPR
Best team in the world
Sort of
Comment
Comment