Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What would you rather we had?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What would you rather we had?

    A top three PL defence, or a top three PL attack (five players in either group). No in-betweens, one or the other.

  • #2
    Top 3 Defenders because we are leaking too many goals. Once your defence strong, they can get more balls to the midfield and hence to the strikers espcially If you have good full backs who can both defend and attack.
    QPR fan since1987

    @yousef_qpr

    Comment


    • #3
      Defence. If you dont let in goals you cant lose games.
      You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.

      Comment


      • #4
        Blackpool scored goals for fun last year and they are in the fizzy pop league again now = defenders, but ideally, ones that go up for set pieces and score goals too
        #standuptocancer
        #inyourfacecancer

        Comment


        • #5
          Goals give you points.
          QPR
          Best team in the world
          Sort of

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Shania View Post
            Goals give you points.
            Not when you're conceeding more than you score.
            You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.

            Comment


            • #7
              Defenders WIN YOU CHAMPIONSHIPS, STRIKERS WIN YOU GAMES....

              Comment


              • #8
                Defence for me. Our midfield is fine, we have some attacking options, but our back four needs an overhaul.
                Supporting QPR isn't just about a football team. It's about roots and identity.

                Comment


                • #9
                  So with our defence, no-one wants aguero, silva, balotelli and two scoring midfielders? We'd surely score more than we let in?

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X