Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

should 'mods' be democratically elected by members???

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • should 'mods' be democratically elected by members???

    is this food for thought????
    you know nothing john snow!!!!

  • #2
    This is a private web site paid for by the people who own it. With all due respect who are you to tell them how to run it?

    No matter how much people bitch about it, it still gets a lot more posts and visits than any other QPR forums.

    Comment


    • #3
      point taken but is it a bit like ..'its my ball....let me play or i'll take it away'???
      you know nothing john snow!!!!

      Comment


      • #4
        No.
        Next question?
        Banning people is no longer my hobby,
        but take a look at my photo blog:

        http://kirillqpr.blogspot.com/

        How and why did I start supporting QPR in Estonia:
        http://www.wearetherangersboys.com/forum/blog.php?b=852

        Comment


        • #5
          True, but I think Pete acknowledged there was a f*** up somewhere and stood down.

          There are 2 sides to it though. If mods don't over do it there might be someone that get offended by something no matter how small it may seem. I've 'over-moderated' on other QPR fan sites and got shot down for it and feel like its a case of dammed if you do and dammed if you don't.

          Back to the original point of being elected - I don't think a popularity contest will the most effective way to get people who will do the best job. It could lead to getting a 'nazi' moderator and getting someone who will let anything go - last thing you need is a lack of consistency.

          Comment


          • #6
            Feel free.
            "Trust In Warnock" - Don't just type it - Do It.

            Comment

            Working...
            X