Originally posted by Ric-Roc
View Post
My personal view is that Spurs were led a merry dance by Boris Johnson, OPLC and the government, enticing them to bid purely to ensure West Ham's bid would have the legacy athletics track in the contractual documentation to meet Lord Coe's completely unfeasible "legacy" commitments to the IOC. Before Spurs bid, West Ham's intention was to remove the track - Gold and Sullivan are quoted 18 months ago saying football and athletics didn't mix. Spurs bid, lo and behold, the track stays. What a co-incidence. Problem for those stakeholders is that Spurs and Orient (and a couple of casino's that were also apparently stiffed by Westfield and the London Borough of Newham) didn't go away quietly and started to ask all sorts of questions that left ministers and council officials squirming. The judicial review would have, in my personal opinion, opened up Pandora's Box or dirt and double dealing. Again, don't think the government expected Spurs and Orient to go through with the JR and was a case of "who blinks first". On this occassion the OPLC blinked.
Comment