Chelsea want the White City site.

[rangerforevereastcote]

So let me get this straight. Most fans (at a guess) want a new stadium because Loftus Rd is too small/ cramped/ old fashioned and they don't like rival fans making rude comments about our ground because it makes their willies feel small. But nor do they want to share because they don't like Chelsea. Nor do they want a ground anywhere further out because that would be a mild inconvenience. Oh, and they don't want to pay any more money to sit in the new ground but they do want better players to watch. All of this should be funded by the owners, even though a new ground in central London ony to be used once a fortnight (and not at all in summer) would cost several hundred million pounds (ie the entire wealth of our majority shareholder).

In short, fans want it all. In short, I have seen more maturity in the sandpit at my kids primary school. Personally I think sharing with Fulham could make more sense as - despite the evidence of last weekend - we are better matched, but if the owners decide it makes sense to go with Chelsea, then get over yourselves and start backing them like they have backed QPR.

agree here , we back our owners to do what is right for the future of qpr , we cant pick and choose it is their money after all wont be happy but roma and lazio hate eachother yet share a staium im sur ewe can ,

[Bigears]

So let me get this straight. Most fans (at a guess) want a new stadium because Loftus Rd is too small/ cramped/ old fashioned and they don't like rival fans making rude comments about our ground because it makes their willies feel small. But nor do they want to share because they don't like Chelsea. Nor do they want a ground anywhere further out because that would be a mild inconvenience. Oh, and they don't want to pay any more money to sit in the new ground but they do want better players to watch. All of this should be funded by the owners, even though a new ground in central London ony to be used once a fortnight (and not at all in summer) would cost several hundred million pounds (ie the entire wealth of our majority shareholder).

In short, fans want it all. In short, I have seen more maturity in the sandpit at my kids primary school. Personally I think sharing with Fulham could make more sense as - despite the evidence of last weekend - we are better matched, but if the owners decide it makes sense to go with Chelsea, then get over yourselves and start backing them like they have backed QPR.

Hmmmmm let me think.......... could not have put it better myself

[Gtleighsr3]

I like the idea, I also like us to move into the bridge if they **** off

[80sCasual]

Bringing 20,000 to a 60,000 seater stadium will still not look as bad as Queens Park who bring 500 to a 50,000 seater stadium!

I'm not sharing with a team from Glasgow, anyway too far to go

[Shania]

No,no,no,no

[qprjames]

Really hope we don't share with them. Means one of our main assets wouldn't be fully owned by the club.

[lymehoop]

I'm all for a 60,00 stadium, think of the advantages, you could drop one and get away with it

[Del]

I'm all for a 60,00 stadium, think of the advantages, you could drop one and get away with it

Also nobody could argue about ST prices as they'd have 5 seats each for the price of 1.....

[QPR_NW10]

They can do it in Milan, why not with us and Chelsea? can't really see the issue. we'd have the local bars which would be qpr/chelsea depending on the weekend.
it's perfectly doable.

[lymehoop]

Also nobody could argue about ST prices as they'd have 5 seats each for the price of 1.....

also a chance of getting your picture in the papers . . .in the spot the crowd competition

[Factamondo]

would you get into bed with your sister???....its akin to that imho!!!

[HammersmithR]

Would the filth be allowed to keep their name if they moved to White City? That would put me over the edge if they came to this part of the borough. All teams represent roughly the area where they're from.

[West Acton]

As said on another thread does prem rules not stop clubs moving into another clubs catchment area is this not what Oreint are saying as part of the olympic stadium

[Olly]

Would the filth be allowed to keep their name if they moved to White City? That would put me over the edge if they came to this part of the borough. All teams represent roughly the area where they're from.

Like woolwich arsenal. How far are we away from queens park? What name could we give them? Chelsea travellers, blue pik.eys

[RLHoop]

I'd have to take some anti-semetic toilet wipes before sitting down.