Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Chelsea want the White City site.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Chelsea want the White City site.

    LBH&F are open to listening to CFC only on the basis of a ground share arrangement with us.

    Think Allianz - think Bayern and 1860

    Feel free to revisit this thread over the coming months and years.

  • #2
    Originally posted by Nodge70 View Post
    LBH&F are open to listening to CFC only on the basis of a ground share arrangement with us.

    Think Allianz - think Bayern and 1860

    Feel free to revisit this thread over the coming months and years.
    Cheers Nodge

    For our sake (commercial advantages aside) i really hope upon hope we dont ground share!!
    You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.

    Comment


    • #3
      OH

      OH GREAT SO WE END UP WITH A 80 THOUSAND STADIUM,with zero atmoshereoh blasted hell
      Click here to view my blog.

      More...

      Comment


      • #4
        Said this weeks back, when Chelsea were touting the new stadium, and where it would be the west London arena is meant to be shared with us, not Fulham.

        Comment


        • #5
          In the words ofthe kaiser chiefs...... I predict a riot.
          http://twitter.com/Mellowhoop

          Comment


          • #6
            Dont like the sound of it.Chelsea will want a 60,000 seater stadium,which is fair enough but how dreadful will that look when we are playing there infront of 19,000. "Darlington" springs to mind

            Comment


            • #7
              plans for the site were on display in Westfield, and local rags a few months back as part of the Goverments regeneration zone . Lots of buildings but no stadium
              Football played the Charlie Ferris way

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by uxbridgeranger View Post
                Dont like the sound of it.Chelsea will want a 60,000 seater stadium,which is fair enough but how dreadful will that look when we are playing there infront of 19,000. "Darlington" springs to mind
                If ever this was the case then I'm sure we could sell our tickets really cheap to fill the ground.

                Comment


                • #9
                  If we ever ground shared with chelsea, would that mean two lots of names on your seat, and would you vandalise it in between home games?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Greengrass View Post
                    If we ever ground shared with chelsea, would that mean two lots of names on your seat, and would you vandalise it in between home games?
                    I dont think I'd be able to resist the temptation to write "loves *penis picture*" after the Chelski fans name on the seat for much more than 2 games.
                    You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      After Abramovich goes and chelsea drop out of the football league entirely, they will sign the ground over to us in embarrassment, and play on wandsworth common, or the nearest playground.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I'd have to take some anti-septic toilet wipes before sitting down.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          a 60,000 seater stadium - we can just make the pitch double size and both play at the same time. There will still be empty seats.
                          twitter @silvercue

                          soundcloud

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            We can offer all schools, students a big discount and each Malaysian Airlines and Air Asia customer who fly to LHR a free ticket to QPR.

                            I hope ground share don't come into it.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              there just are not enough suitable sites in West London for Chelsea and QPR to build big new stadiums. So it may be ground share or lose out to Chelsea who seem to have got a step ahead.
                              twitter @silvercue

                              soundcloud

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X