The difference to the club is they give them all they sell 3100 ish tkts they give us tier they sell 2500 tickets cos o the covered seats , easy to see that , veryone moaning about seeing rangers buy a ticket for Sunday tkts available in lower school end
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Chelsea allocation.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by rangerforevereastcote View PostThe difference to the club is they give them all they sell 3100 ish tkts they give us tier they sell 2500 tickets cos o the covered seats , easy to see that , veryone moaning about seeing rangers buy a ticket for Sunday tkts available in lower school end
Comment
-
Originally posted by silvercue View PostI don't think it is only about getting more Rangers fans in...also be good to have less of them and our fans behind both goals. My opinion anyway.
Fans lost their right when they chose to not come to the games
Comment
-
Originally posted by silvercue View Postwe are giving them over 3 times the amount we have to. Do you think they will give us 9,000 tickets, which is 3 times what they have to?
I'll take bets.
We've given them the lower to capitalise on the extra £30-50k by being able to sell the front half of the stand.
Will be the same for all Cat A games.
Comment
-
I think the belief that a big away following influences the result is a myth. I have been many an away game when we have packed the away end sung our hearts out and the team has not turned up, its a common complaint from Rangers fans.
Yes it would be better to have Rangers but by the time they cordon off the front rows how many of our own are actually in the lower tier.
And why at Rangers do they cordon off the front rows they don’t do it at Wolves, Arsenal, West Ham and Sheffield Utd where opposition fans sit above and below each other
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jamie View PostFront rows are overhung by upper tier so drink/spit/****/missiles could rain down on those rows.
If we have to cordon off seats and given the argeument we are giving clubs an allocation beyond which is actually required why dont we cordon off the front rows of the upper tier so their are more rangers in the lower
Comment
-
Originally posted by West Acton View PostGranted but the teams mentioned above dont cordon off seats they just manage the situation. Cant think of any other club that adopts our policy.
If we have to cordon off seats and given the argeument we are giving clubs an allocation beyond which is actually required why dont we cordon off the front rows of the upper tier so their are more rangers in the lower
Comment
-
Originally posted by West Acton View PostGranted but the teams mentioned above dont cordon off seats they just manage the situation. Cant think of any other club that adopts our policy.
If we have to cordon off seats and given the argeument we are giving clubs an allocation beyond which is actually required why dont we cordon off the front rows of the upper tier so their are more rangers in the lower
Comment
-
Comment