That white panel looks awful. The away strips look good though and there's nothing more appealing than fit birds in QPR shirts.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
new look kits
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by alcesterhoop View PostHow hard is it to make a decent job of adding the sponsor?
Move it down onto the white hoop and reduce it in size by 10-15% and i'm happy.
On the other hand Air Asia will be well happy.Last edited by paulmason; 12-09-2011, 12:00 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by paulmason View PostIf someone can be bothered, put the Malaysian Airlines logo on last years kit, and you will see what I mean about the the hoops being too narrow to allow a logo to look good and be seen, which is what they have paid lots of money for. I am amazed that a top marketing department in a top company would allow their logo displayed like that, so it is not to be seen around the world.
On the other hand Air Asia will be well happy.
100% agree, the away shift sponsor looks great, unfortunately the home one looks cheap
Comment
-
Unfortunately the home kit was always likely to be ruined once a sponsor logo went on top. Shame cos without it had become one of my favourite kits of ours in years.
The AirAsia logo would have looked better on the home, shame it wasn't the other way around.
Interesting dilemma for Tony and club - he wants to use us to promote his own businesses but by doing so the club will presumably miss out on greater sponsorship revenue that would allow a measure of self-sufficiency.
Think a stadium naming rights deal could be on the agenda at some point.
Comment
-
Totaly agree, the Malaysian Airlines logo looks awful on the home shirt...
It would have been far better to have a red Air Asia logo on the home shirt and the MA logo with the white background on the other shirts...
Having said that i'm sure it wont affect the way that we play so i'm still as happy as a pig in **** at the moment...We got our Ranger's back!
Comment
-
Comment