Here is one for older Rs-
I was thinking of the strike rate of modern 'wingers' whom we now tend to designate 'wide players' and it seems to me that expectations are not that high. I was recalling some of our wingers in the late 50s and early 60s and my recollection is that some have a very respectable strike rate. Do you remember the likes of Pat Kerrins, John McClelland and Mark Lazarus? I don't have the figures but I reckon they all have a ratio about a goal in 3 on average. McClelland in particular was a playerI liked and seemed to score regularly for a wiinger. I think our overall performance with both he and Lazarus in the team was not what the inherent talent would have been expected to have achieved perhaps we just conceded too many.
I was thinking of the strike rate of modern 'wingers' whom we now tend to designate 'wide players' and it seems to me that expectations are not that high. I was recalling some of our wingers in the late 50s and early 60s and my recollection is that some have a very respectable strike rate. Do you remember the likes of Pat Kerrins, John McClelland and Mark Lazarus? I don't have the figures but I reckon they all have a ratio about a goal in 3 on average. McClelland in particular was a playerI liked and seemed to score regularly for a wiinger. I think our overall performance with both he and Lazarus in the team was not what the inherent talent would have been expected to have achieved perhaps we just conceded too many.
Comment