Confirmed roles within the club

[Minty]

I think this is very unfair on Jeffro. It's a simple question.

If I can maybe read between the lines of his thinking behind the question (maybe making 5 out of 2+2, but hey-ho)......

This club of ours has suffered a lot in the 'Paladini/T & C years' from things just 'going quiet', and us fans being led to believe that something has changed - a good example is that Flavio was supposedly out of the picture, but as soon as some of the vitriol towards him died down a bit, he just popped up in the thick of it again.

Another example - we were led to believe at one stage that the Mittals had become the majority shareholders, but it was in fact Bernie.

That, I feel, is what Jeffro is getting at. I think he just wants to see it in black and white that Paladini has been removed from the club, so we can wholeheartedly move on and not have this nagging thought that maybe he is still here, as we've had so much cr@p in the past where stuff hasn't been made clear in black and white, and it's come back to haunt us.

I reckon people should wind their necks in and accept that this is a forum. Nothing offensive or against the board rules has been said.

[bbedford]

If you look at the website Paladini is no longer Chairman of QPR FC.

His title and job is now listed under TF as QPR FC Chairman and QPR Holdings Chairman.

Paladini if there has some other job!!

[Kirill]

Will he get some kind of a farewell club statement on the official site, as most prominent staff members get, or will he re-emerge in some purely nominal position?

[MrSwakeley]

Will he get some kind of a farewell club statement on the official site, as most prominent staff members get, or will he re-emerge in some purely nominal position?

I think that's the very least he deserves after everything he's supposedly done for the club.

[supahoopsaaa]

Is it a coincidence Pete has removed himself from posting here also? Or is that too far fetched?

[trumpet trousers]

PeterG,

Has anyone said he cannot ask the question? No. Some have questioned why, as they feel it's not too much of an issue.

Of course people can discuss what they want within the rules. And I for one have not told others what to discuss or not. I was simply asking the question as to why, when there have been numerous threads about what is happening with him, we need another new one as opposed to adding to the others.

What I just cannot get to grips with, even now, is the hate for one individual. Perhaps we could start a thread on why he is seen as so divisive, because that would indeed be interesting. Although I feel that as is so often the case, facts will get overtaken by personal opinions gained from reading those of others.

For the record, I have no strongly held views on him either way, particularly now. And despite being in place when we returned to the Premier League, for me, Briatore has much more reason to be disliked. Regardless of "saving" the club, he just gave the impression of being an uncaring, arrogant and odious individual with almost no respect at all for the likes of you and me.

My mate terry Ball was banned for a year for posting a link to an article in the chronicle regarding Paladini going to Italy. Hardly freedom of speech within the boundaries is it

[Kirill]

My mate terry Ball was banned for a year for posting a link to an article in the chronicle regarding Paladini going to Italy. Hardly freedom of speech within the boundaries is it

Your friend obviously did not bother telling you why he really got banned, posting a link to the article certainly was not the reason

[trumpet trousers]

Your friend obviously did not bother telling you why he really got banned, posting a link to the article certainly was not the reason

oh.. what was the reason then?

[EYR]

Gianni Paladini the most over done to death boring topic in the history of qpr forums,every single angle and viewpoint has been done ten times over.

[Quaz]

Gianni Paladini the most over done to death boring topic in the history of qpr forums,every single angle and viewpoint has been done ten times over.

[paulmason]

As I said, the mod's on here seem to be / have to be sympathetic to our ex chairman and if they are not, pete closes things down.






MOD NOTE: If only you knew how wide of the mark you are with that guess/comment!

[Quaz]

As I said, the mod's on here seem to be / have to be sympathetic to our ex chairman and if they are not, pete closes things down.

not all mods mate, i don't give a toss one way or the other

[paulmason]

Why worry About a thread you don't give a toss about, let alone post on, what a waste of time that would be.

[Quaz]

Why worry a thread you don't give a toss about, let alone post on, what a waste of time that would be.

being staff i have to read the threads, goes with the job

[paulmason]

being staff i have to read the threads, goes with the job

Thats a fair comment, but you dont have to comment on them all though do you, especially the ones you don't give a toss about........ Unless you have too.