Fitz Hall has lasted 2.5 games........

[HammersmithR]

I'm not his biggest fan, but it makes you wonder how Gorks given how much he played last year was sold ahead of him.

Hall's record for us is abysmal. He is unable to play any succession of games without breaking down.

He seems to be one of Warnock's favourites especially as he started last year as captain, but I really cannot see what he brings to the party over any length of time.

I think one of our successes last season and for any side who want to win things is to have a settled back 4. Look at Man Utd, Arsenal and Liverpool over the years. Defensively they were all fairly consistent with their back 4. When Hall plays, he lasts about 2 or 3 games before he breaks down. The bloke is on good money and I don't see how it can be justified when he has been with us since Jan 2008.

He is clearly not fit enough and his body is clearly not up to the demands of professional football so in my book will have to go.

[davman]

Many of us have been saying this for years. It doesn't matter how good a player is; if he can't stay fit, then he is no use... So, we get rid of Gorkss and have to buy two more CBs in the window - you go figure...

[loftlag]

These posts are very disrespectful to buyig clubs,
Do you 2 posters really think any club on the look out for a C/H would come in for Fitz He is an injury prone liabilty on high wages.Warno stated Fitz or Gorks would have to go, it answers its self

[Minty]

I also think Hall should have gone before Gorkss.

[Bigdave]

I'm not his biggest fan, but it makes you wonder how Gorks given how much he played last year was sold ahead of him.

Hall's record for us is abysmal. He is unable to play any succession of games without breaking down.

He seems to be one of Warnock's favourites especially as he started last year as captain, but I really cannot see what he brings to the party over any length of time.

I think one of our successes last season and for any side who want to win things is to have a settled back 4. Look at Man Utd, Arsenal and Liverpool over the years. Defensively they were all fairly consistent with their back 4. When Hall plays, he lasts about 2 or 3 games before he breaks down. The bloke is on good money and I don't see how it can be justified when he has been with us since Jan 2008.

He is clearly not fit enough and his body is clearly not up to the demands of professional football so in my book will have to go.

Totally agree, he just dont seem to be able to shake a knock off. He is a liability we cant rely on the bloke.
Gorrks may not have any pace but for me is a better defender than Hall

[winalotto]

Didn't put us off of buying Dyer did it?

[Ric-Roc]

Should have kept Gorkks.

NW obviously rates Fitz Hall. Thought he's looked decent to be fair to him but as usual his injury record is abysmal.

[winalotto]

Hall is decent when fit...

[HammersmithR]

Hall is decent when fit...

But hardly plays.

The bloke is on nearly 20k a week! How can in it be justified given his injury record?

Dyer is on a pay as you play basis.

[Stanley]

Players NW always singles out for special praise:

Hall
Taarbs
Faurlin
Hill
Kenny
Mackie
Derry
HH

Players who he rarely if ever mentions:

Buzz
Gorkks
Shittu

We all know who his favourites are.

[HammersmithR]

Players NW always singles out for special praise:

Hall
Taarbs
Faurlin
Hill
Kenny
Mackie
Derry
HH

Players who he rarely if ever get a mention:

Buzz
Gorkks
Shittu

We all know who his favourites are.

So true! Some of his post match comments are so predictable!

[Stanley]

Fitz Hall tweet

"Injury is okay hopefully be alright for next game. Just a little problem with my back"